arXiv AI

SMC-ES: Automated synthesis of formally verified control policies

arXiv:2607. 15003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deployment of autonomous cyber-physical systems in safety-critical environments requires closed-loop control strategies (i.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 17

Formal Verification of Learned Multi-Agent Communication Policies via Decision Tree Distillation

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) enables agents to develop coordination strategies through emergent communication, but neural policies lack the formal safety guarantees required for safety-critical robotic deployment in drone swarms and autonomous vehicle fleets. We present the first end-to-end framework for safety verification of learned multi-agent communication policies through policy abstraction: neural policies are distilled into interpretable decision trees, then formally verified, with empirical validation confirming that verified safety properties transfer to original networks.

arXiv AI
Jun 19

Formal Verification of Learned Multi-Agent Communication Policies via Decision Tree Distillation

arXiv:2606. 19632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) enables agents to develop coordination strategies through emergent communication, but neural policies lack the formal safety guarantees required for safety-critical robotic deployment in drone swarms and autonomous vehicle fleets.

By Ahmad Farooq, Kamran Iqbal
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Finite-Sample Probabilistic Safety Certification for AI-Based Grid-Edge Coordination

The paper introduces a finite‑sample probabilistic safety certification framework for black‑box AI decision models used in closed‑loop grid operation. It transforms the AI‑grid evaluation into a binary unsafe outcome under a safety specification and applies exact binomial inference to provide a tight one‑sided upper bound on the unsafe operation probability, using held‑out calibration scenarios. The framework also incorporates physically interpretable sample‑space adversarial attacks to address distribution shifts and is validated through case studies involving 1,000‑agent AI models for grid‑edge flexibility coordination.

By Yihong Zhou, Hanbin Yang, Thomas Morstyn
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces new evaluation metrics for safe reinforcement learning that go beyond average safety guarantees by examining how often and how severely safety bounds are violated, consistency across tasks and bounds, and the relationship between training-time and final policy behavior. It also proposes a safety tier system for categorizing algorithms and presents empirical safety evaluations on multiple navigation tasks. The authors recommend reporting aggregate metrics, distributional data, and task‑specific results together, and provide an open‑source suite, SafeRLEval, to facilitate reliable safety assessment.

By Lindsay Spoor, Aske Plaat, Thomas Moerland
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Turning Safety into Competence: Minimally Exploitable Robot Policies via Safety-Filtered Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces Safety to Competence (S2C), a two‑stage reinforcement learning framework that first learns a safety filter and then trains a competitive task policy while embedding the filter. By separating safety synthesis from task learning, S2C reduces training complexity and prevents the policy from being exploited by adversarial attacks. Experiments on simulated touchdown games show that S2C achieves higher win rates, better Elo ratings, and lower exploitability than eight safe‑RL baselines, and hardware tests confirm its competence against a human opponent.

By Ruihan Wu, Rui Yang, Donggeon David Oh, Duy Nguyen, Haimin Hu
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Scenario Generation for Risk-Aware Reinforcement Learning with Probably Approximately Safe Guarantees

arXiv:2606. 04812v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Guaranteeing safety is critical to the deployment of reinforcement learning (RL) agents in the real-world, especially as policies learned using deep RL may demonstrate susceptibility to transition perturbations that result in unknown or unsafe behaviour.

By Mohit Prashant, Arvind Easwaran