arXiv:2610.16998v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep search enables language agents to solve complex information-seeking tasks through iterative web exploration. However, developing robust open-sourc...
By Cong Pang, Jiaqi Su, Chengrui Wu, Kuihao Yan, Tianrui Zhang, Zixuan Qiu, Chao Lin, Zixiu Lin, Zixuan Chen, Zelin Xiao, Tiankuo Yao, Jiawei Hong, Zixuan Chen, Dan Xu, Lewei Lu, Wenjie Wang, Xin Lou
arXiv:2607. 24850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons.
By Lang Mei, Xiaohan Yu, Chong Chen, Liyan Liu, Xiangnan Chen, Jinchao Ma, Chao Feng, Li Huang, Siyu Mo, Sichen Kang, Yunkun Xu, Zhihan Yang, Zhujun Xue, Jingren Zhang, Qing He, Yingdi Huang, Hao Jiang, Ziao Ma, Zewei Pan, Minhao Sun, Zhuo Tao, Jinzhao Xiao, Gangtao Xin, Huanyao Zhang, Wenjian Zhang, Jiangshan Zhang, Guojie Zhu, Fangzhou Zou, Jiaxin Mao, Wentao Zhang
arXiv:2610.15910v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Deep Research agents rely on long-horizon reasoning and iterative tool use to solve complex information-seeking tasks. However, adaptive decision-m...
By Mingchen Li, Jiatan Huang, Hong Yu
arXiv:2605.24218v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Deep research agents extend the role of search engines from retrieving keyword-matched pages to synthesizing knowledge, fundamentally changing how...
By Jian Xie, Tianhe Lin, Zilu Wang, Yuting Ning, Yuekun Yao, Tianci Xue, Zhehao Zhang, Zhongyang Li, Kai Zhang, Yufan Wu, Shijie Chen, Boyu Gou, Mingzhe Han, Yifei Wang, Vint Lee, Xinpeng Wei, Xiangjun Wang, Yu Su, Huan Sun
arXiv:2606. 15367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents aim to solve complex knowledge-intensive tasks through long-horizon planning, evidence gathering, reasoning, and report generation.
By Yao Dong, Xinglin Xiao, Liwei Dong, Xinlong Jin, Zhengbo Li, Heng Zhang, Duyun Wang, Nan Xu
Scientific datasets are commonly organized as hierarchical repositories containing heterogeneous and interdependent files, making their inspection, integration, and analysis labor-intensive and reliant on domain expertise. Although large language model (LLM) agents have advanced substantially in planning, reasoning, and tool use, existing research has largely overlooked their ability to interact with real scientific data assets through executable environments.
Deep Research Bench II is a new benchmark designed to evaluate Deep Research Agents (DRAs) by requiring them to produce research reports for 132 grounded tasks across 22 domains. Each report is assessed using 9,430 fine‑grained binary rubrics that cover information recall, analysis, and presentation, all derived from expert‑written investigative articles through a rigorous LLM‑plus‑human pipeline. Evaluation of current state‑of‑the‑art DRAs shows that even the best models satisfy fewer than 50% of these rubrics, highlighting a significant gap between automated agents and human experts.
By Ruizhe Li, Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Xiaorui Wang, Zhendong Mao
G-ReAct is a reasoning framework that frames deep search as state evolution over a fixed-topology query graph, enabling explicit tracking of search progress and constraint preservation. It generates high-quality trajectories for fine-tuning and provides structured guidance during inference without extra fine-tuning. Experiments show that with only 1.9K generated trajectories, a Qwen3 model achieves strong accuracy on BrowseComp-ZH and XBench, outperforming larger open-source baselines, and consistently improves existing LLMs on deep-search tasks.
By Shaoxiong Yang, Mengyuan Zhang, Shaojun Lin, Chao Li, Wei Liu, Kun Shao, Jian Luan
UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.
By Yijuan Liang, Xinghao Chen, Yifan Ge, Ziyi Wu, Hao Wu, Changyu Zeng, Wei Xing, Xiaoyu Shen
arXiv:2610.24899v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: While LLM agents are increasingly capable of gathering and synthesizing evidence from a single homogeneous source, such as structured tables...
By Soyoung Yoon, Peiran Xu, Han Wang, Ruofan Wu, Xiaodong Yu, Feng Yan, Mohit Bansal, Debiao Li, Seung-Won Hwang, Yuxiong He, Zhewei Yao
arXiv:2603. 17216v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the advent of AI agents, automated scientific discovery is becoming an increasingly plausible goal.
By Ziyang Cai, Amir Saeidi, Harkirat Behl
The paper introduces F$^{2}$DR, a fine‑grained reward framework designed to evaluate end‑to‑end DeepSearch workflows, which involve planning, reflection, retrieval, and answer generation. F$^{2}$DR assesses workflows along three dimensions—Content, Trajectory, and Answer—to provide a comprehensive process‑level evaluation. The authors also present DeepSearch RM‑Bench, a benchmark that tests reward models in DeepSearch scenarios and shows strong discriminative power over existing open‑source models.
By Bojian Xiong (Tianjin University), Wentao Ding (Baidu Inc.), Yujing Lu (Baidu Inc.), Shaowei Zhang (Tianjin University), Ling Shi (Tianjin University), Jing Liao (Baidu Inc.), Yan Wang (Baidu Inc.), Yueyang Zhang (Baidu Inc.), Long Xia (Baidu Inc.), Zhiyuan Sun (Baidu Inc.), Daiting Shi (Baidu Inc.), Jingzhou He (Baidu Inc.), Yuqi Ren (Tianjin University), Deyi Xiong (Tianjin University)