arXiv:2510.25183v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Energy-efficient AI should be evaluated across the full application pipeline, not only by lowest error or shortest training time. We study th...
By Avyay Kodali, Priyanshi Singh, Pranay Pandey, Krishna Bhatia, Shalini Devendrababu, Srinjoy Ganguly
arXiv:2608. 19497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We characterize the learning dynamics of a compact hybrid quantum forecasting model through comparison with a structurally aligned classical baseline.
By Sandra Leticia Ju\'arez-Osorio, Jorge I. Hernandez-Martinez, Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Martinez, Andres Mendez-Vazquez, Eduardo Rodriguez-Tello
arXiv:2603. 09789v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate financial volatility forecasting is crucial but challenged by the non-linear, highly correlated nature of market data.
By Yixiong Chen
arXiv:2604. 08277v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present QARIMA, a quantum state-similarity-based reconstruction of the classical ARIMA modelling pipeline.
By Nishikanta Mohanty, Bikash K. Behera, Badshah Mukherjee, Pravat Dash, Giuseppe Sergioli, Roberto Giuntini
arXiv:2607. 19506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses fixed quantum dynamics as a high-dimensional temporal feature map and trains only a lightweight classical readout.
By Krishna Bhatia, Gautami Sanjay Naik
The paper compares classical and hybrid quantum machine learning models for a trigger-like binary classification task using CMS open data. Eight classical models (SVM, ANN, CNN, LSTM) and eight quantum counterparts are evaluated under identical preprocessing, data splits, and decision thresholds, with performance measured by accuracy, ROC‑AUC, F1‑score, precision, and recall. The best classical model is an artificial neural network (93.53 % accuracy, 0.9819 ROC‑AUC), while the best quantum model is a quantum convolutional network (90.89 % accuracy, 0.9731 ROC‑AUC), indicating that within an eight‑qubit budget the quantum models do not surpass the classical ones.
By Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Awais Rafique, Talab Hussain, Juan Pablo Perez Aguilar, Alfredo Raya, Muhammad Ahsan
arXiv:2605. 18333v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate and efficient time-series forecasting remains a challenging problem for both classical and quantum neural architectures, particularly in multivariate environmental settings.
By Alberto Marchisio, Aayan Ebrahim, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Kashif, Muhammad Shafique
The paper evaluates hybrid quantum‑classical machine learning for predicting reduced‑order spatiotemporal brain deformation fields. Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to compress high‑dimensional displacement data, the authors compare static temporal‑to‑latent regression and autoregressive latent forecasting models. Classical neural networks outperform all quantum variants, though enhanced quantum circuits improve over minimal ones, indicating that classical architectures still hold a clear advantage in fidelity and stability for this task.
By Tao Liu, Ge He, Dongyu Liang, Wujie Wen
arXiv:2607. 16358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents a unified quantum-classical hybrid framework for multi-horizon time-series forecasting, introducing two model variants Quantum Reservoir Forecaster (QRC-F) and Variational Quantum Forecaster (VQF-F).
By Sanjay Chakraborty, Fredrik Heintz
arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.
By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
QART is a quantum‑classical hybrid architecture that augments a language model with quantum encoding, CIM‑based QUBO optimization, and quantum decoding to improve long‑horizon reasoning. The authors claim that, under certain assumptions, QART can maintain a non‑zero probability of recovering an optimal reasoning path while traditional autoregressive LLMs see their acceptance probability drop to zero as cumulative risk grows. Experiments on six benchmarks with three backbone models show that QART outperforms the baselines in 14 of 15 pairings, with relative gains up to 84.0% on SciCode.
By Lehao Lin, Yuheng Cheng, Guolong Liu, Yao Li, Xuning Tan, Xiyuan Zhou, Ruixi Zou, Shi Wang, Huan Zhao, Wenxuan Liu, Haifeng Wu, Junhua Zhao
arXiv:2604.07639v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In...
By Haimeng Zhao, Alexander Zlokapa, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush, John Preskill, Jarrod R. McClean, Hsin-Yuan Huang