arXiv AI

Sanity Checking Causal Representation Learning on a Simple Real-World System

The paper evaluates causal representation learning (CRL) methods on a controlled optical experiment where the true causal factors are known. All selected methods fail to reliably recover these factors, even when the data-generating process is simplified to a synthetic version. The study highlights reproducibility issues and the importance of mixing function assumptions, underscoring the gap between theoretical promise and practical performance of CRL techniques.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

CausalArena: Benchmarking Causal Discovery in the Foundation Model Era

CausalArena is a new benchmark designed to evaluate causal discovery methods in the era of foundation models. It unifies synthetic structural causal models (SCMs), semantically grounded SCMs, and formula‑grounded SCMs, while also including real‑world datasets for external validation. Experiments show that performance rankings vary widely across different SCM families and protocols, indicating that strong results on one benchmark do not necessarily transfer to others.

By Zi-Rong Li, Si-Yang Liu, Tian-Zuo Wang, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv AI
Aug 20

CausalProfiler: Generating Synthetic Benchmarks for Rigorous and Transparent Evaluation of Causal Machine Learning

CausalProfiler is a synthetic benchmark generator designed to evaluate causal machine learning (Causal ML) methods more rigorously and transparently. It randomly samples causal models, data, queries, and ground truths based on explicit design choices across observation, intervention, and counterfactual reasoning levels, providing coverage guarantees and transparent assumptions. The authors demonstrate its utility by testing several state‑of‑the‑art methods under diverse conditions, both within and outside the identification regime, highlighting the insights CausalProfiler can reveal.

By Panayiotis Panayiotou, Audrey Poinsot, Alessandro Leite, Nicolas Chesneau, Marc Schoenauer, \"Ozg\"ur \c{S}im\c{s}ek
arXiv AI
Jul 3

Causal Explanations for Image Classifiers

arXiv:2411. 08875v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing algorithms for explaining the output of image classifiers use different definitions of explanations and a variety of techniques to find them.

By Hana Chockler, David A. Kelly, Daniel Kroening, Youcheng Sun
arXiv Statistics ML
2d ago

CausalCompass: Evaluating the Robustness of Time-Series Causal Discovery in Misspecified Scenarios

CausalCompass is a benchmark framework that evaluates the robustness of time‑series causal discovery (TSCD) methods when modeling assumptions are violated. The authors benchmark several TSCD algorithms across eight assumption‑violation scenarios, finding that no single method dominates all settings but deep learning approaches generally perform best. They also analyze hyperparameter sensitivity, conduct ablation studies, and highlight the impact of preprocessing on methods like NTS‑NOTEARS.

By Huiyang Yi, Xiaojian Shen, Yonggang Wu, Duxin Chen, He Wang, Wenwu Yu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 10

CausalArena: Benchmarking Causal Discovery in the Foundation Model Era

CausalArena is a unified, evolvable benchmark designed to evaluate causal discovery methods across diverse structural causal models (SCMs). It incorporates synthetic SCMs for controlled structural variation, semantic operational SCMs for human-auditable environments, and formula-grounded SCMs to test discovery under explicit scientific mechanisms, along with real-world datasets for external validity. Experiments show that performance rankings vary significantly across SCM families and protocols, indicating that strong results on one benchmark do not generalize to others, especially in the context of causal discovery foundation models.