arXiv:2606. 29717v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting a material's properties from its structure is a central, fast-advancing problem in computational materials science.
By Chenmu Zhang, Boris I. Yakobson
arXiv:2608. 15900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven materials discovery interpolates more reliably than it extrapolates and seldom reaches new structure types.
By Dinh-Khiet Le, Minh-Quyet Ha, Hong-Phuc Vu-Dinh, Takashi Miyake, Hiori Kino, Hieu-Chi Dam
arXiv:2606. 07712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress in AI-driven crystal materials science has so far been carried by narrow architectures purpose-built for individual tasks -- graph neural networks for property prediction, diffusion and flow-matching models for crystal generation -- each excelling within its niche yet unable to act as a shared backbone across the full spectrum of materials problems.
By Zhan'ao Yao, Boxuan Zhang, Jingyuan Shu, Xiaoyu Wu, Rongyan Wang, Linjing Li, Dajun Zeng, Yudong Yao, Tingwei Chen, Youwei Wang, Xiaolin Zhao, Jiahui Shi, Jianjun Liu
This thesis develops robust and efficient AI frameworks for accelerating crystalline materials discovery by addressing both major stages of the materials-design pipeline: crystal property prediction a...
The thesis presents AI frameworks that accelerate crystalline materials discovery by tackling both crystal property prediction and crystal structure generation. It introduces CrysXPP, CrysGNN, and CrysMMNet for efficient, data‑sparse property prediction using graph autoencoding, self‑supervised pretraining, and multimodal learning. For generation, TGDMat is a text‑guided diffusion model that jointly learns lattice parameters, atomic types, and coordinates, enabling valid, stable, and conditionally generated periodic materials.
By Kishalay Das
arXiv:2604. 13354v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The discovery of inorganic crystal structures with targeted properties is a significant challenge in materials science.
By Auguste de Lambilly, Vladimir Baturin, David Portehault, Guillaume Lambard, Nataliya Sokolovska, Florence d'Alch\'e-Buc, Jean-Claude Crivello
arXiv:2610.18314v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This work discusses and tests the potential of reaction graphs for material synthesis, in which events consist of reaction steps (actions) and their ou...
By Yevgeny Rakita, Paul Todd, James R. Neilson, Simon J. L. Billinge
The article reviews methods for assessing large language model (LLM) based AI agents in materials synthesis, focusing on their integration with experimental tools. It outlines evaluation strategies—including knowledge, reasoning, tool‑use, and closed‑loop benchmarks—and applies them to atomic layer deposition (ALD) as a case study. A practical framework for evaluating LLMs in this context is also presented.
By Angel Yanguas-Gil
The article introduces the concept of agentic programs—scientific software that blends deterministic algorithms with bounded large‑language‑model (LLM) judgment, task‑specific verification, episodic maturation, and full delegation in production. It argues that recent LLM‑based agents enable this new form of computational materials science software. The authors illustrate the idea with DeMARS, an agentic program designed to build atomistic models from experimentally measured disordered crystal structures.
By Yunsung Lim, Haekwan Jeon, Jaesun Kim, Jisu Kim, Seungwu Han
arXiv:2606. 01012v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI for materials science is a critical topic within AI for science, aiming to accelerate materials discovery and produce accurate property predictions.
By An Vuong, Minh-Hao Van, Chen Zhao, Xintao Wu
arXiv:2511. 14007v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) raises expectations of substantial increases in rates of technological progress, but such anticipations are often not connected to detailed ground-level studies of AI use in innovation processes.
By John P. Nelson, Olajide Olugbade, Philip Shapira, Justin B. Biddle
The paper introduces AI Theorist, a system of AI agents that autonomously discovers physical models by generating hypotheses, performing first‑principles calculations, and refining them based on evidence. Applied to the quantum material α‑RuCl₃, the system interprets optical and photocurrent data, revealing distinct excitonic states with different optical selection rules and spatial distributions. This marks the first demonstration of an AI system autonomously developing a physical model to explain previously unpublished experimental observations in a quantum material using first‑principles and many‑body calculations.
By Hongjian Zhou, Xianfan Nie, Sean Wu, Tarun Patel, Jinge Wu, Andrew Liu, Adam Wei Tsen, David A. Clifton