arXiv AI

Learning Not To Interfere: Adapting Experts For Model Merging

The paper introduces Resolving Interference (RI), a lightweight adaptation framework that reduces cross‑task interference when merging expert models. RI disentangles expert models to be functionally orthogonal to other tasks, using only unlabeled auxiliary data, and improves merging performance by up to 3.8% and generalization to unseen domains by up to 2.3%. The method is robust to the source of auxiliary input and less sensitive to hyperparameter tuning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Model Merging via Data-Free Covariance Estimation

The paper introduces a data‑free method for model merging that estimates per‑layer covariance matrices directly from difference matrices, eliminating the need for auxiliary data. This approach reduces computational costs while maintaining a principled interference‑minimization framework. Experiments on vision and language benchmarks with models from 86 M to 7 B parameters show that the method outperforms existing data‑free merging techniques.

By Marawan Gamal Abdel Hameed, Derek Tam, Pascal Jr Tikeng Notsawo, Colin Raffel, Guillaume Rabusseau
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Learning to Recover Task Experts from a Multi-Task Merged Model

Multi-task model merging aims to consolidate several task-specific experts into a unified model, yet static merging consistently suffers from parameter interference. While dynamic merging models aim to bridge this gap, many works rely on the costly storage and loading of redundant expert components at inference.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

CAMFT: Conflict-Aware Mergeable Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models

CAMFT is a Conflict‑Aware Mergeable Fine‑Tuning method designed to make task adaptation efficient and merge‑aware for large language models. Unlike existing approaches that only resolve parameter conflicts after fine‑tuning, CAMFT shapes mergeability during training by guiding each task to update sparse coordinates with lower cross‑task conflict. Experiments show that CAMFT outperforms standard fine‑tuning baselines in multi‑task merging scenarios.

By Jingang Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Yuan Ma, Han Zhu, Xu-Yao Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Escaping Low-Dimensional Overlap: Multi-Task Model Merging via High-Dimensional Sparse Disentanglement

The paper introduces a new multi‑task model‑merging framework that tackles task interference by projecting task vectors into a high‑dimensional sparse feature space using Sparse Autoencoders, enabling feature‑level disentanglement before fusion. It also proposes a lightweight Group‑Ranked Zeroth‑Order Optimizer to identify task‑critical layers for selective merging, reducing computational overhead. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑1.5B and Qwen2.5‑7B show consistent performance gains over several baselines across reasoning, code generation, instruction following, and general knowledge tasks, with a 2.78% improvement in a highly conflicting four‑task setting.

By Yihang Zhang, Shengke Sun, Junjie Wen, Feng Zeng
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 30

Orthogonal Yet Coupled: Decoupling Geometric Components for Model Merging

The paper introduces DiGA, a Disentangled Geometry-Aware framework for merging pretrained models. DiGA orthogonally decomposes each task vector into components tied to distinct geometric attributes, aggregates these components independently, and then recombines them, thereby preserving each component’s geometric identity. Experiments across various models, tasks, and merging methods show that DiGA improves merged-model performance and reduces capability degradation.

By Zijing Wang, Yongkang Liu, Mingyang Wang, Ercong Nie, Mengjie Zhao, Yunpu Ma, Kang Liu, Zihan Wang, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Hinrich Sch\"utze