arXiv:2601. 19788v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated Continual Learning (FCL) leverages inter-client collaboration to better balance new knowledge acquisition and old knowledge retention on non-stationary data.
arXiv:2609.38833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated continual learning must integrate new tasks over time without losing earlier-task knowledge. Most existing methods attach an anti-forgetting...
arXiv:2601. 22601v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated unlearning (FU) aims to erase designated client-level, class-level, or sample-level knowledge from a global model.
arXiv:2406.02447v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) aims at unburdening the training of deep models by distributing computation across multiple devices (clients) while safegua...
arXiv:2606. 08452v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many real-world settings, data streams are nonstationary and arrive sequentially, requiring learning systems to adapt continuously without retraining from scratch.
arXiv:2607. 15587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual learning studies how deployed language models can continually acquire new tasks without expensive retraining from scratch.
Federated Learning (FL) of foundation and edge models increasingly targets deployments where client data distributions drift over time, yet existing forgetting-mitigation methods assume each client's distribution is stationary. Flashback, the strongest recent FL method against cross-client (spatial) forgetting, uses monotonically accumulating per-class label counts as a knowledge proxy; this proxy becomes miscalibrated under temporal distribution shift and anchors the global model to an outdated class balance.
arXiv:2607. 19384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world intelligent systems often require both distributed collaboration across data-isolated clients and continual adaptation to evolving tasks.
arXiv:2404.07729v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continual learning (CL) evaluates adaptability in learning solutions to retain knowledge. Our research addresses the challenge of catastrophic forg...
The paper argues that catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity alone cannot explain why naive sequential training underperforms offline joint training. It introduces data co-observation as a third factor, showing that observing training data together consistently improves performance across supervised and self-supervised settings. The study also reinterprets common continual learning methods, suggesting that memory replay’s success stems from restoring co-observation benefits rather than merely mitigating forgetting.
arXiv:2601. 22601v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated unlearning (FU) aims to erase knowledge from a global model.
arXiv:2603. 11201v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The world is inherently dynamic, and continual learning aims to enable models to adapt to ever-evolving data streams.
arXiv:2603. 12658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continual learning (CL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to enable large language models (LLMs) to dynamically adapt to evolving knowledge and sequential tasks while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, a critical limitation of the static pre-training paradigm inherent to modern LLMs.