On the Generalization of Steering Vectors for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness
arXiv:2607. 29062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model capabilities have improved in large part due to scaling chain of thought.
The paper investigates whether language models possess latent rhetorical abilities, specifically analogy reasoning, before instruction tuning. By extracting an "Analogy Vector" from the residual stream, the authors demonstrate that this vector can steer explanation style across several instruction-tuned models, improving performance metrics. Their findings reveal a continuous gradient of behavioral accessibility tied to the amount of instruction exposure during training, challenging the binary base‑vs‑instruct distinction and suggesting that instruction exposure shapes rhetorical knowledge in activation space.
arXiv:2607. 29062v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model capabilities have improved in large part due to scaling chain of thought.
The paper investigates how large language models balance instruction-following with pattern completion when the two objectives conflict. By creating dialogues where a user instruction to act in a target way T is opposed by assistant turns that demonstrate a competing pattern P, the authors measure instruction-following rates across 13 models and 16 instructions over up to 50 turns. Results show wide variability (1%–99%) in instruction adherence, with robustness influenced by instruction content, output format, and chain-of-thought reasoning, but overall instruction-following remains brittle under induction pressure.
arXiv:2609.23065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) can sound plausible yet be unfaithful to the model's underlying reasoning. Most prior work probes CoT faithfulness through inp...
arXiv:2604.17614v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Skills are a natural unit for describing what a language model can do and how its behavior can be changed. However, existing characterization...
arXiv:2607. 28683v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models benefit from elements in natural language, such as metaphors and analogies in training data and inference input to achieve generalisability across different domains.
arXiv:2507. 18043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time steering methods offer a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying internal activations at test time without updating model weights.
The paper examines how Large Language Models’ internal representations become sparser as task difficulty rises, finding that harder inputs lead to more concentrated activation patterns in the last hidden state. This sparsity–difficulty relationship holds across various models and domains, indicating that models learn dense representations for familiar patterns but default to sparse activations for unfamiliar ones. Leveraging this insight, the authors propose Sparsity‑Guided Curriculum In‑Context Learning (SG‑ICL), which selects few‑shot demonstrations based on sparsity and outperforms standard CoT and Auto‑CoT baselines on the MATH‑500 benchmark.
The paper introduces the Flow Moment, a reasoning pattern marked by sustained, process‑confirming verbalizations, contrasting with the revision‑oriented Aha Moment. It proposes Flow‑CoT, a rewritten version of reasoning traces that preserves content while highlighting Flow Markers, and uses it as auxiliary supervision in on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD). The authors further present Aha‑Flow Distillation (AFD), a dual‑mode extension of OPSD that pairs concise solution‑based supervision (Aha branch) with rewritten Flow‑CoT under a confident reasoning instruction (Flow branch). Experiments on AIME25 and HMMT25 with Qwen3‑8B and Qwen3‑4B models show consistent performance gains, and controlled ablations confirm that the dual‑mode training structure contributes to the improvement.
arXiv:2608. 16627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural language explanations (NLEs) are increasingly used as inputs, for example, as few-shot rationales that influence model behavior in in-context learning (ICL).
arXiv:2609.25602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In language models, the choice between believing the prompt and believing the weights is made by a handful of identifiable attention heads. Instruction...
arXiv:2608.29956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models often answer complex reasoning questions without revealing intermediate steps, raising whether they reason latently or complete p...
The study examines whether large language models (LLMs) show syntactic convergence with human users by analyzing turn‑adjacent reuse of context‑free grammar (CFG) rules in 1,901 matched positions across sixteen open‑weight Llama and Gemma models. All models exhibited greater CFG‑rule overlap with the preceding human turn than with unrelated primes, especially for lower‑frequency rules, and instruction‑tuned models showed even higher overlap with the actual prime than the human responses they replaced. However, instruction tuning also increased overlap with unrelated primes, reduced the actual‑versus‑random difference, and lowered conditional rule‑reuse odds when controlling for rule‑set size, while consistently producing responses with higher lexical and semantic similarity to the preceding turn.