arXiv:2608. 06474v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models increasingly generate complete websites from natural-language descriptions, and reinforcement learning has become a central approach to closing their remaining functional gap.
By Boshui Chen, Huiping Liu, Shaolei Zhang
arXiv:2604. 06367v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Web agents automate browser tasks, ranging from simple form completion to complex workflows like ordering groceries.
By Guruprasad Viswanathan Ramesh, Asmit Nayak, Basieem Siddique, Kassem Fawaz
arXiv:2608. 12851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving LLM agents convert successful trajectories into persistent cross-task state.
By Xutao Mao, Liangjie Zhao, Xiang Zheng, Cong Wang
arXiv:2606. 17645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) web agents are usually deployed as tool callers: each turn, the model reads a fresh page observation and emits one structured tool action.
By Shiqi He, Yue Cui, Feijie Wu, Xinyu Ma, Jiaheng Lu, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, Mosharaf Chowdhury
arXiv:2606. 09399v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present SUPERBROWSER, an autonomous web-navigation agent designed against a single guiding hypothesis: a web agent should browse the way a person browses.
By Radeen Mostafa, Sawradip Saha
arXiv:2606. 15034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents are increasingly evaluated by whether they complete realistic desktop and web tasks.
By Mina Mohammadmirzaei, Jeffrey Flanigan
arXiv:2606. 02965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks for autonomous agents measure whether agents complete tasks, yet this framing is systematically blind to whether an agent should have proceeded at all.
By Victor Ojewale, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
arXiv:2606. 05805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based guardrails typically safeguard agents by evaluating proposed actions or inputs before execution, producing safety signals such as binary allow/deny decisions, risk categories, and/or explanatory rationales about potential policy violations.
By Yuhao Sun, Jiacheng Zhang, Shaanan Cohney, Zhexin Zhang, Feng Liu, Xingliang Yuan
arXiv:2606. 17929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-using agents drive real software through the screen -- clicking and typing -- but they solve every task from scratch: asked to repeat a task, an agent re-reads the screen, re-reasons every tap, and pays the full cost again.
By Bojie Li
arXiv:2606. 15673v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Web agents act through long interaction sequences, yet existing benchmarks evaluate only terminal success, discarding all process information and offering little guidance on improvement.
By Jiwan Chung, JiHyuk Byun, Vibhav Vineet, Seon Joo Kim
arXiv:2607. 25398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-model agents are increasingly deployed under standing instructions: a system prompt, a policy file, or a skills document is placed in context, and the agent is trusted to let it govern every action that follows.
By Liudas Panavas, Sebastian Minus, Bradley Monton, Derek Ray, Suhaas Garre, Sushant Mehta, Edwin Chen
arXiv:2607. 24167v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon web agents often go off track before final failure: a trajectory can remain locally plausible even after the current state, reused skill, or plan assumption no longer supports the user instruction.
By Guangyi Liu, Huan Zhao, Quanming Yao