Privacy-sensitive and distributed characteristics of multi-center medical data bring severe obstacles to centralized modeling for accurate early prediction of sepsis. Federated learning (FL) has attracted growing attention as a promising framework for collaborative model development, as it allows multiple institutions to jointly train predictive models without directly sharing or centralizing raw data.
arXiv:2607. 08595v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models often rely on data from a single institution or centrally pooled datasets.
By Hyunho Mo, Djura Smits, Mahlet A. Birhanu, Maarten J. G. Leening, Daniel Bos, Pim van der Harst, Esther E. Bron
arXiv:2607. 19532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning has emerged as a potential solution to privacy concerns associated with using sensitive health data for training predictive models, particularly in personalised cancer care.
By Ruth Amey, Muhammad Arifur Rahman, Taha Osman, Nicholas Shopland, Andy Burton, Mufti Mahmud, David J. Brown
arXiv:2508. 10017v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) presents a groundbreaking approach for collaborative health research, allowing model training on decentralized data while safeguarding patient privacy.
By Rodrigo Tertulino
arXiv:2608. 03498v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed healthcare institutions without centralising sensitive patient data.
By Rojalini Tripathy, Padmalochan Bera, Shreya Ghosh, Rajkumar Buyya
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed healthcare institutions without centralising sensitive patient data. However, real-world healthcare federations are often characterised not only by non-IID data, but also by heterogeneous clinical objectives and partially overlapping feature spaces.
arXiv:2607. 10467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Healthcare organizations often cannot freely centralize patient data because medical records are sensitive, regulated, and institutionally controlled.
By Sakshi Gorkhali, Jonesh Shrestha
arXiv:2605. 18936v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Social media text data are often used to train Machine Learning (ML) models to identify users exhibiting high-risk mental health behaviors.
By Nuredin Ali Abdelkadir, Anjali Ratnam, Zeerak Talat, Stevie Chancellor
arXiv:2606. 31742v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) methods have demonstrated significant success in recent years at identifying relevant features in input data that drive deep learning model decisions, enhancing interpretability for users.
By Maximilian Andreas Hoefler, Karsten Mueller, Wojciech Samek
arXiv:2607. 28191v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple institutions to train shared models without exchanging raw clinical EEG data, but it does not fully prevent privacy leakage from individual model updates.
By Pouya Rajabi, Mohsen Toorani
arXiv:2606. 23871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data.
By Natalia Moreno-Blasco, Anusha Ihalapathirana, Pekka Siirtola, Miguel Fernandez-de-Retana
arXiv:2607. 19524v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning (FL) offers a promising approach to privacy-preserving clinical risk prediction, but its deployment remains limited by restricted data sharing, client heterogeneity, class imbalance, and the lack of realistic tabular electronic health record (EHR) benchmarks.
By Akarsh K Nair, Muhammad Arifur Rahman, Nicholas Shopland, Andy Burton, Jun He, Yuan Shen, David Baldwin, Emma O'Dowd, Amna Burzic, Mufti Mahmud, David J. Brown