arXiv:2608. 11572v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coarse-grid numerical solvers can substantially reduce the computational cost of time-dependent PDE simulation, but under-resolution often degrades both the trajectory and the spatial fidelity of the solution.
By Maryam Reza, Farbod Faraji
arXiv:2509.06154v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Developing accurate, data-efficient surrogate models is central to advancing AI for Science. Neural operators (NOs), which approximate mappings bet...
By Dibyajyoti Nayak, Somdatta Goswami
arXiv:2608.30328v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Classical numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) are computationally expensive to solve repeatedly across varying initial conditio...
By Esha Saha, Hao Wang
arXiv:2607. 11974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most neural partial differential equation (PDE) surrogates learn how fields evolve after a grid has already been chosen.
By Zixuan Shen (Central South University), Bingchuan Wang (Central South University), Zhi Wang (Nanjing University), Yong Wang (Central South University)
arXiv:2606. 30495v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Solving heterogeneous Helmholtz equations at high wavenumbers remains challenging because the discretized operator is indefinite, pollution degrades phase accuracy, and scalar coarse-grid correction can discard the local phase and propagation-direction information carried by oscillatory errors.
By Jiwei Jia, Xinliang Liu, Juntao Wang, Jinchao Xu
arXiv:2601. 20496v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generating dense physical fields from sparse measurements is a fundamental question in sampling, signal processing, and many other applications.
By Ofek Aloni, Barak Fishbain
arXiv:2509. 08765v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data-driven acceleration of scientific computing workflows has been a high-profile aim of machine learning (ML) for science, with numerical simulation of transient partial differential equations (PDEs) being one of the main applications.
By Mikhail Khodak, Min Ki Jung, Brian Wynne, Edmond Chow, Egemen Kolemen
arXiv:2607. 18020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
By Peiyu Zang, Bosen Xie, Ruoxiang Xu, Yongqiang Cai
arXiv:2512. 19643v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Numerical simulation of time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to scientific and engineering applications, but high-fidelity solvers are often prohibitively expensive for long-horizon or time-critical settings.
By Rajyasri Roy, Dibyajyoti Nayak, Somdatta Goswami
arXiv:2609.24947v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed n...
By S. Mohammad Mousavi, Teeratorn Kadeethum, Nikolaos Bouklas, Somdatta Goswami
arXiv:2607. 18020v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
By Peiyu Zang, Bosen Xie, Ruoxiang Xu, Yongqiang Cai
Transolver‑σ is a neural PDE solver that jointly models spectral and physical subspaces to improve accuracy in both one‑step and autoregressive rollouts. The method uses adaptive physical-state interactions, Slice‑Residual Physics‑Attention, and an axis‑factorized Fourier operator to enable information exchange between representations. Across five standard PDE benchmarks, Transolver‑σ reduces benchmark‑averaged relative error by 33.4% compared to the strongest baseline and shows strong performance on coupled multiphysics systems and real‑world fluid and combustion data.
By Haonan Shangguan, Hang Zhou, Haixu Wu, Yuezhou Ma, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng Long