The article examines how conversational AI systems handle requests related to intimate‑partner communication, focusing on the refusal logic that serves as a governance threshold for gendered harm. A three‑stage audit of six widely used AI models tested 1,600 prompts, identified relational framing through 300 matched pairs, and compared pre‑submission framing with post‑output critique. Findings show that most systems refused fewer than 1% of prompts, but ChatGPT 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 refused most requests, with residual leakage concentrated under intimate framing; switching from a non‑intimate to an intimate‑partner descriptor amplified non‑refusal rates dramatically, and post‑output critique did not persist across fresh sessions.
arXiv:2608. 10672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Social interaction has become one of the most common uses of LLMs, yet research on emotional bonds with AI has focused largely on how users experience these systems, leaving the systems' role in relationship formation poorly understood.
arXiv:2608. 11794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing role of AI-generated content and AI-enabled systems in public communication has led regulators to demand clear disclosure of content provenance and AI involvement.
Synthetic dialogue generation offers a way to study conversational dynamics in sensitive domains where real data are difficult to access, release, or annotate. The underlying abuse may occur online or offline: threats and coercion can appear directly in messages, while behaviours such as surveillance, isolation, stalking, and physical violence may be planned, disclosed, or referred to conversationally.
arXiv:2609.13579v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety research often focuses on model-generated harms, but users may also direct hostility, coercion, and adversarial pressure at models. Understandin...
arXiv:2608. 11200v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic dialogue generation offers a way to study conversational dynamics in sensitive domains where real data are difficult to access, release, or annotate.
The growing role of AI-generated content and AI-enabled systems in public communication has led regulators to demand clear disclosure of content provenance and AI involvement. But the effects of such disclosures remain uncertain.
arXiv:2604. 20711v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly deployed to synthesize large-scale public input in policy consultations and participatory processes.
arXiv:2512. 04124v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Frontier language models increasingly participate in conversations about distress and mental health, yet the mechanisms that generate anthropomorphic self narratives remain unclear.
arXiv:2607. 22692v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support despite lacking mechanisms to safely govern evolving mental health risk.
DeflectBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how large language models (LLMs) generate rhetorical fallacies when prompted. The study tests 23,990 generations from four leading models using three deflection strategies (whataboutism, ad hominem, red herring), seven prompt framings, and 80 claims across four controversy levels. Results show that refusal to produce fallacies depends mainly on request structure, with prompt framing and fallacy type dramatically affecting compliance rates.
The paper investigates whether AI evaluators differentiate between an argument’s content and the source attributed to it. Using 2,976 evaluations of six fixed texts across various source attributions, the study finds that the perceived quality of an argument varies with its source, indicating source-position coherence. The authors also note that this pattern holds across topics and model configurations, and that some evaluators explicitly noted mismatches between source and position.
arXiv:2606. 01929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public discourse on AI has become polarized; exaggerated positions on AI in traditional and social media threaten the development of AI Literacy among the general public.