arXiv Computer Vision

VerNav: Verifier-First Low-Latency Vision-and-Language Navigation

arXiv AI
Jun 30

CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

arXiv:2606. 28397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language navigation (VLN) has recently advanced with large language and multimodal models, enabling agents to follow natural-language instructions in unseen environments without training a task-specific navigation policy.

By Shaoxuan Li, Xiangyu Dong, Xiaoguang Ma, Junfeng Chen, Haoran Zhao, Yaoming Zhou
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

LookStep: Efficient Vision-Language Navigation with Linguistic Foresight and Event Driven Memory

LookStep is a new end‑to‑end framework for Vision‑Language Navigation that integrates Language‑Centric Future State Modeling with an Event‑Driven Rolling Memory. It uses language labels to predict coarse navigation progress and future states for candidate actions, and autonomously decides which observations to store in a bounded memory with semantic roles. Empirical results show that LookStep outperforms existing methods on VLN‑CE tasks, achieving a 49.7% success rate on R2R‑CE Val‑Unseen while improving memory efficiency and reducing data requirements.

By Kun-Yang Yu, Yingzhe Li, Hongyu Xu, Shi-Yu Tian, Zhi Zhou, Yang Chen, Ming Yang, Sheng Wang, Qing Yu, Lan-Zhe Guo, Yu-Feng Li
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

Robust Vision-Language Navigation with Awareness of Instruction-Execution Progress

The paper introduces VLN-AIEP, a Vision‑Language Navigation framework that integrates instruction‑execution progress awareness into navigation decisions. By linking the visited trajectory to the instruction, it suppresses embeddings of already executed content and matches candidate locations with pending instruction segments. The method employs a landmark‑anchored trajectory representation to encode semantic labels and geometry, enabling progress estimation without explicit supervision and achieving strong results on R2R, RxR, CVDN, and R2R‑CE benchmarks.

By Jiagan Huang, Zikun Zhou, Hongpeng Wang, Guangming Lu, Jun Yu, Wenjie Pei
arXiv AI
Sep 30

Seek Before You Move: Evidence Seeking for Progress Grounding in Vision-Language Navigation

SeekVLN is a new framework for Vision‑Language Navigation that addresses the problem of agents acting on insufficient evidence, termed Progress Myopia. It combines semantic progress reasoning with active evidence seeking, trained first with Future‑guided Reverse Generation to augment expert trajectories, and then refined via Counterfactual Contrastive Policy Optimization to reward beneficial seeking actions. Experiments on simulated benchmarks show significant gains, improving success rates by 12.7% on R2R‑CE and 7.5% on RxR‑CE, and real‑world tests demonstrate human‑like evidence‑seeking behavior.

By Zhimin Wang, Meiyuan Zhu, Duo Wu, Linjia Kang, Yajun Wang, Yuan Ni, Xiaohang Wang, Tianlu Pan, Jingyan Jiang, Yaowei Wang, Zhi Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 3

CoFL-S: Spatially Queryable Sector Flow Fields for Local Language-Conditioned Navigation

arXiv:2607. 02222v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Navigation has increasingly emphasized high-level instruction reasoning, memory, global map construction, and instruction decomposition, while the low-level action representation remains comparatively underexplored.

By Haokun Liu, Zhaoqi Ma, Yicheng Chen, Wentao Zhang, Masaki Kitagawa, Zicen Xiong, Jinjie Li, Moju Zhao
arXiv AI
Oct 1

AVERT-VLN: Abstention-aware Visual Error Recovery and Training for Vision-and-Language Navigation

AVERT-VLN introduces a closed‑loop framework for vision‑and‑language navigation that incorporates an abstention‑aware Monitor to detect instruction‑execution inconsistencies. The Monitor is trained on a new LOSTNAV dataset of 20K counterfactual risk trajectories and fine‑tuned on 40K normal trajectories to recognize semantic deviations. During deployment, the Monitor can suspend autonomous navigation and request human guidance, while offline preference learning uses deviation‑associated failures to improve the policy, achieving 76.2% and 66.3% success on R2R‑CE and RxR‑CE unseen splits.

By Minrui Liu, Jingke Wang, Yuehao Huang, Hao Su, Jiajun Lv, Yukai Ma, Yong Liu