arXiv AI

FLARE: A Systematic, Uncertainty-Aware Framework for Evidence-Based Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

FLARE is a systematic, uncertainty‑aware framework that evaluates the financial and operational implications of adopting AI in healthcare. It integrates fuzzy logic, time‑driven activity‑based costing, and return‑on‑investment analysis to estimate costs of clinical service delivery, AI development and operation, and the economic impact of workflow integration. A case study on AI‑assisted large vessel occlusion detection in the CT stroke pathway demonstrated that FLARE can quantify conventional pathway costs, AI‑related costs, and AI‑enabled savings, identifying a break‑even threshold of about 3,992 patients per year and a positive first‑year ROI at typical stroke volumes of 5,000 patients.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes

The paper presents a four‑module, data‑driven framework to identify and prioritize robotic process automation (RPA) opportunities in U.S. hospitals. It includes a process taxonomy, an automation suitability index, a tool‑tier selection recommendation, and a return‑on‑investment analysis, all applied to a synthetic portfolio of twenty hospital processes. The authors demonstrate the framework’s robustness through Monte Carlo simulations and discuss governance and future validation steps.

arXiv AI
Sep 2

AI Morbidity and Mortality: A Framework for Clinical AI Failure Review

AI Morbidity and Mortality (AI M&M) is a structured, blameless framework designed to review clinical AI failures. It combines standardized case intake, evidence preservation, investigator reconstruction, tool‑in‑loop attribution, and corrective‑action tracking, classifying each event across four linked dimensions: Trigger, Mechanism, Clinical Pathway, and Corrective Action. The authors demonstrate the framework with five outpatient medication and clinical decision‑support cases, achieving full agreement among reviewers on all classification axes.

By Paulius Mui, Dean F. Sittig, Steve Labkoff, Sanjay Basu
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Improving Rural Medication Safety with AI: A Scoping Review

The scoping review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) is applied across all stages of medication management in rural healthcare settings, from prescribing to post-administration monitoring. It identifies four main themes: the types of AI used, the medication phases impacted, the effectiveness in reducing errors, and rural-specific challenges such as infrastructure and alert fatigue. Studies show machine‑learning surveillance can cut prescribing and transcription errors by 34% to 80%, yet barriers like governance gaps, funding limits, and clinician resistance remain.

By Jeong-ah Kim, Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Daniel Terry, Maryam Rouhi
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Evidence-Grounded AI for Musculoskeletal Care

arXiv:2607. 12527v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Musculoskeletal diseases are among the leading causes of disability worldwide and create the greatest global need for rehabilitation.

By Wenjie Li, Yujie Zhang, Fanrui Zhang, Haoran Sun, Renhao Yang, Junjun He, Weiran Huang, Yuanfeng Ji, Chenrun Wang, Kailing Wang, Hongcheng Gao, Kaipeng Zhang, Hanyu Wang, Angela Lin Wang, Xingqi He, Yilin Huang, Shiyi Yao, Lilong Wang, Yankai Jiang, Yirong Chen, Chenglong Ma, Jiyao Liu, Ming Hu, Gen Li, Yidong Xu, Chengyu Zhuang, Jiawei Liu, Yin Zhang, Lequan Yu, Lu Chen, Yinpeng Dong, Lei Liu, Carlos Gutierrez Sanroman, Yu Qiao, Weijie Ma, Xiaosong Wang, Lei Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 3

READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent Deployment

READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent Deployment introduces a framework for qualifying AI agents for enterprise workflows. It measures reliability and operating cost under various oversight policies, selects the minimum‑cost policy that meets a specified reliability target, and statistically qualifies it on held‑out cases. In a clinical audit study, READY revealed that two agents with nearly identical autonomous accuracy required markedly different levels of human review to achieve the same reliability target.

By Veronica Chatrath (Christy), Bryan Zhu (Christy), Jingxuan Fan (Christy), George Pu (Christy), Soham Dinesh Tiwari (Christy), Soham Dan (Christy), Ryan Young (Christy), Yuan (Christy), Li, Yuang Yao, Apaar Shanker, Minglai Yang, Daniel Yue Zhang, Yunzhong He, Ying Liu, Chenguang Wang, Zhijun Yin, Yuan Xue
arXiv AI
Aug 11

From Single Chatbots to Governed Agent Ecosystems: An Agentic AI Pattern Catalogue and Orchestration Framework for Mission-Critical Hospital Information Management Systems

arXiv:2608. 07627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hospitals are racing to embed AI, while coping with the surge in adaptation of the technology in other industries, into the triage management, documentation, scheduling, and revenue-cycle workflows, yet most deployments remain as fragmented pilots that stall at the edge of production, exposing patients and institutions to operational fragility, ungoverned risk, and mounting technical debt.

By Manideep Dhar, Ritwik Singh, Sharat Chandra Kumar Manikonda
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Algorithm Design and Physician Liability

arXiv:2608. 13618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A single clinical algorithm can deliver unequal accuracy across patient groups, and concern about such disparity has grown as artificial intelligence (AI) spreads through clinical decision-making.

By Shujie Luan, Shubhranshu Singh, Tinglong Dai