PatentAgentBench is a new benchmark that tests large language model agents on 510 real-world patent tasks across eight suites, including novelty search, freedom‑to‑operate, design FTO, invalidity search, claim charting, patent drafting, office‑action response, and patent translation. The benchmark uses curated patent records and expert‑reviewed annotations to evaluate task‑specific metrics, requiring agents to search patent collections without pre‑supplied candidate pools and to produce high‑quality drafting and response work. Seven LLMs were evaluated on four agent harnesses, revealing that current systems still struggle with novelty identification, risk assessment, and understanding practitioner intent throughout patent workflows.
By Yijie Hu, Wei Li, Junjie Zhou, Zhiqi Jiang, Yi Jin, Licong Xu, Xinkai Sun, Kai Duan, Lisha Zhang
arXiv:2603.20884v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: To alleviate the heavy burden of paper screening, researchers increasingly rely on existing AI agents, such as AI reviewers or DeepResearch, for pa...
By Jiajun Hou, Hexuan Deng, Wenxiang Jiao, Xuebo Liu, Xiaopeng Ke, Derek F. Wong, Min Zhang
ScholarCatalyst is a new benchmark that evaluates how well AI systems can retrieve research papers that inspire new work. The dataset was created by having 184 lead authors of 207 recent computer science papers annotate which earlier papers helped their projects, providing detailed rationales. The benchmark tests retrieval from the literature available at the start of a project, revealing that current agentic search and even advanced models like Claude Fable 5.1 perform only modestly better than simple embedding retrieval.
By Sohyeon Kim, Yoonho Lee, Bo Liu, Dayoon Ko, Rulin Shao, Seungone Kim, Graham Neubig, Pang Wei Koh, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Akari Asai, Omar Khattab, Yejin Choi, Gunhee Kim, Chelsea Finn
arXiv:2607. 24850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons.
By Lang Mei, Xiaohan Yu, Chong Chen, Liyan Liu, Xiangnan Chen, Jinchao Ma, Chao Feng, Li Huang, Siyu Mo, Sichen Kang, Yunkun Xu, Zhihan Yang, Zhujun Xue, Jingren Zhang, Qing He, Yingdi Huang, Hao Jiang, Ziao Ma, Zewei Pan, Minhao Sun, Zhuo Tao, Jinzhao Xiao, Gangtao Xin, Huanyao Zhang, Wenjian Zhang, Jiangshan Zhang, Guojie Zhu, Fangzhou Zou, Jiaxin Mao, Wentao Zhang
Optimist Deep Research is an open‑source agent that conducts literature research as an iterative, state‑centric process. It breaks a research question into a tree of subquestions, uses search intents to query multiple scholarly databases, and merges results into a provenance‑preserving document registry. The agent iteratively expands the registry via citation snowballing, evaluates evidence, and refines the research plan through a critic that can add, split, rephrase, deprioritize, or close subquestions, ultimately producing a report with every citation linked to a retrieved document.
By Gihan Panapitiya
arXiv:2606. 15367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents aim to solve complex knowledge-intensive tasks through long-horizon planning, evidence gathering, reasoning, and report generation.
By Yao Dong, Xinglin Xiao, Liwei Dong, Xinlong Jin, Zhengbo Li, Heng Zhang, Duyun Wang, Nan Xu
Scientific datasets are commonly organized as hierarchical repositories containing heterogeneous and interdependent files, making their inspection, integration, and analysis labor-intensive and reliant on domain expertise. Although large language model (LLM) agents have advanced substantially in planning, reasoning, and tool use, existing research has largely overlooked their ability to interact with real scientific data assets through executable environments.
arXiv:2610.33644v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Research ideas are always proposed under resource constraints: a plan must fit the available compute, API credit, and time. Yet evaluations of research...
By Shunchao Zhou, Chang Yang, Jingrui Wang, Shuxin Zhuang, Rundong Wang, Runsheng Yu, Xinrun Wang
arXiv:2606. 20235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration.
By Tingyue Pan, Mingyue Cheng, Daoyu Wang, Yitong Zhou, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2609.14412v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep research agents answer complex questions through iterative loops of searching, reading, and reasoning. Recent work on reasoning-intensive benchmar...
By Radin Hamidi Rad, Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Sajad Ebrahimi, Charles L. A. Clarke, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Ebrahim Bagheri
arXiv:2607. 24791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the dominant paradigm for applying large language models (LLMs) to enterprise document corpora, yet naive implementations encounter hard limits as corpus scale and query complexity grow.
By Mishca de Costa, Muhammad Saleh Anwar, Dave Mercier, Issam Hammad
arXiv:2606. 28365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: RAG ingestion pipelines frequently augment search corpus index with semantic enrichment indices (e.
By Adnan Qidwai, Anand Eswaran, Sonam Mishra, Jaydeep Sen, Sachindra Joshi