The paper introduces SearchWeaver, a framework that automatically optimizes search interfaces for language-model agents by revising corpus artifacts, executable tools, and usage instructions based on execution trajectories and task rewards. By tailoring the interface to each corpus, the method improves answer accuracy from 71.6% to 78.4% on BrowseComp-Plus and raises average nDCG@10 from 45.7 to 55.0 across four BRIGHT subsets. These results demonstrate the benefit of jointly optimizing interface components to enhance agentic search performance.
By Sangjune An, Jaeyoon Jung, Yumin Choi, Jinheon Baek, Junmo Cho, Sung Ju Hwang, Hae Beom Lee
arXiv:2606. 14885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic search over large corpora relies on retriever-mediated interfaces (e.
By Yi Lu, Zhuofeng Li, Ping Nie, Haoxiang Zhang, Yuyu Zhang, Kai Zou, Wenhu Chen, Jimmy Lin, Dongfu Jiang, Yu Zhang
arXiv:2605.29307v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) search agents have shown strong promise on knowledge-intensive tasks through iterative reasoning and retrieval. Mo...
By Alireza Salemi, Chang Zeng, Atharva Nijasure, Jui-Hui Chung, Razieh Rahimi, Fernando Diaz, Hamed Zamani
arXiv:2609.14412v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep research agents answer complex questions through iterative loops of searching, reading, and reasoning. Recent work on reasoning-intensive benchmar...
By Radin Hamidi Rad, Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Sajad Ebrahimi, Charles L. A. Clarke, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Ebrahim Bagheri
arXiv:2607. 28229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans.
By Luigi Sigillo, Matteo Silvestri, Francesco Tabaro, Rajat Bhatnagar, Syed Irtaza Mubashar, Matt Jeffryes, Daljit Nijjer, Vittorio Perera, Ola Spjuth, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Melissa Harrison, Fabio Petroni
arXiv:2605. 02411v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A semantic gap separates how users describe tasks from how tools are documented.
By Kyle Zheng, Han Zhang, Renliang Sun, Chenchen Ye, Wei Wang
arXiv:2607. 20668v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: TextGrad improves language-model systems by revising text from feedback.
By Jaideep Ray, Ankit Goyal
arXiv:2607. 26070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agentic search systems are often evaluated as if the underlying LLM were the only component that matters, yet their measured performance also depends on the surrounding search environment: the Wikipedia snapshot, preprocessing pipeline, chunking policy, retrieval backend, tool schema, observation format, and answer submission rule.
By Guanming Xiong, Penghui Zhang
arXiv:2506. 01952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Powered by large language models (LLMs), web browsing agents operate graphical user interfaces in a human-like manner, offering a transparent and general framework for automating web-based tasks.
By Atsuyuki Miyai, Zaiying Zhao, Kazuki Egashira, Atsuki Sato, Tatsumi Sunada, Shota Onohara, Hiromasa Yamanishi, Mashiro Toyooka, Kunato Nishina, Ryoma Maeda, Kiyoharu Aizawa, Toshihiko Yamasaki
arXiv:2610.01108v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Retrieval-based speculative decoding (SD) drafts tokens by copying continuations from existing text, which suits coding agents that repeatedly repr...
By Sumin Lee, Sukmin Cho, Seungjae Lim, Youngjin Kwon
The paper introduces BRIA (BRanch-Inspect-Adopt), an agent that isolates tool‑candidate investigations into separate branches, executing each candidate independently and then inspecting the execution evidence to adopt only useful results. BRIA dynamically retrieves additional tools as new needs arise during task execution and is evaluated on PlanBench‑XL and MCP‑Atlas with a library of 1,897 tools, outperforming or matching the strongest retrieval baselines. On MCP‑Atlas, BRIA achieves an average claim score of 89.77 versus 75.40 for MCP‑Zero, and it lies on the Pareto frontier for task performance and input‑token cost.
By Anna Mazhar, Seiji Maekawa, Nikita Bhutani
Q2D-Web is a new large‑scale benchmark for agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, featuring a 190 million‑document web corpus and 70 k machine‑reformulated search queries in ten languages. It supplies three sets of relevance judgments—agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set enriched with LLM‑based labels—to evaluate first‑stage retrievers. Experiments on 13 retrievers show consistent ranking across judgment sets but significant variation across domains, languages, and query types, and demonstrate that a carefully sampled sub‑corpus can approximate full‑corpus evaluation with minimal loss in Recall@1000.