arXiv:2604.07518v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT. Existing methods either add...
By Mengdan Zhu, Senhao Cheng, Liang Zhao
The paper introduces Latent Visual Contrastive Reasoning, a branch-aware latent reasoning framework that generates multiple question-conditioned latent visual branches as soft hypotheses over image tokens. It trains these branches using bounding‑box evidence annotations and a soft contrastive branch‑evidence alignment objective, encouraging evidence‑relevant branches to align with annotated visual regions while contrasting against negative evidence. Experiments on perception‑intensive visual reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that the method improves performance over the corresponding backbone and single‑path latent reasoning baselines at both 3B and 7B scales.
By Kegeng Tang, Jingbo Wang, Yangming Zhang, Huanshu Zhang, Shaogang Ren, Zihao Wang
SLVR (Structured Latent Visual Reasoning) is a training framework that blends explicit chain-of-thought with latent reasoning for multimodal large language models. It organizes reasoning into typed latent stages—planning, grounding, evidence selection, and integration—each supervised by corresponding signals such as plans, bounding boxes, visual evidence, and final rationales. Built on Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B, SLVR consistently improves performance on multimodal reasoning benchmarks, achieving significant gains on MMVP, BLINK Relation, V*, MathVista, and ChartQA.
By Albert Gao, Bing Xue, Andrea Zanette
arXiv:2603. 25629v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While language reasoning models excel in many tasks, visual reasoning remains challenging for current large multimodal models (LMMs).
By Andr\'e G. Viveiros, Nuno Gon\c{c}alves, Matthias Lindemann, Andr\'e Martins
arXiv:2605.18641v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Latent visual reasoning involves visual evidence more directly in multimodal reasoning by inserting continuous latent tokens before textual generat...
By Dongyao Zhu, Zhen Wang, Xi Xiao, Han Jiang, Saeed Vahidian, Wei-Lun Chao, Tanya Berger-Wolf, Yu Su, Raju Vatsavai, Jianyang Gu
arXiv:2606. 00562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The emerging paradigm of "thinking with images" embeds visual states into intermediate reasoning steps, defining a new frontier for Vision-Language Models.
By Dongchen Lu, Zhimo Li, Mao Shu, Huo Cao
arXiv:2605.08802v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Due to the potential for exploratory reasoning of Latent Visual Reasoning, recent works tend to enable MLLMs (Multimodal Large Language Models) to...
By Ziyang Ding, Linjian Meng, Yiming Wu, Yuhan Li, Yuhao Liu, Zhen Zhao
arXiv:2604. 09757v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Medical vision--language models (VLMs) have shown strong potential for medical visual question answering (VQA), yet their reasoning remains largely text-centric: images are encoded once as static context, and subsequent inference is dominated by language.
By Suyang Xi, Songtao Hu, Yuxiang Lai, Wangyun Dan, Yaqi Liu, Shansong Wang, Xiaofeng Yang
arXiv:2609.35942v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent work in visual question answering has shown that vision-language models can exhibit strong reasoning capabilities by translating visual inputs i...
By Ting-Chih Chen, Emile van Krieken, Shujian Yu, Filip Ilievski
arXiv:2606. 16122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visual thinking should not only sound right; it should show its evidence.
By Junkai Zhang, Yihe Deng, Kai-Wei Chang, Wei Wang
arXiv:2608. 02833v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chart question answering (CQA) requires multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to integrate visual comprehension with logical reasoning, yet current models struggle with accurate visual grounding and coherent reasoning chains.
By Xuehang Guo, Pingyue Zhang, Ruiyi Zhang, Zhenhailong Wang, Hanrui Lyu, Heng Ji, Tong Sun, Qingyun Wang, Manling Li
The paper introduces LIRSeg, a method that replaces explicit Chain-of-Thought reasoning in multimodal large language models with a compact set of learnable latent tokens for reasoning segmentation. LIRSeg is trained in two stages—spatial alignment and GRPO—while employing extreme-advantage sampling, decoupled exploration-stability updates, and latent diversity amplification to enhance token informativeness. Experiments show that LIRSeg improves segmentation accuracy and reasoning efficiency, achieving significant gIoU gains over the VisionReasoner baseline and reducing reasoning tokens by about 16×.
By Tianhang Guo, Yulin He, Wei Chen, Wenjuan Zhou, Yuhang Li, Xinbiao Gan