arXiv:2607. 07773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: EEG-based emotion recognition is critical for mental health monitoring and affective brain-computer interfaces, yet existing deep learning approaches often treat emotion classes as isolated labels, ignoring their psychological interdependencies.
By Dongyang Kuang, Zizheng Ma, Yushan Zhang, Xiaocong Zeng
arXiv:2608.22387v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Wearable and smartphone-based emotion recognition (WER) remains a challenging setting in affective computing, due to the notorious difficulty and bia...
By Ioannis N. Ziogas, Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis, Ahsan H. Khandoker, Aamna Al Shehhi
arXiv:2607. 02063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used to capture spatial functional connectivity patterns to improve electroencephalography (EEG)-based depression recognition performance.
By Yang Li, Pan Hu, Yan Zhang, Wenfan Yang, Tao Wu, Lianbo Guo
arXiv:2607. 03587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose NetinfoGC, a framework for graph classification that extends the Network Usable Information (NUI) paradigm to graph-level learning.
By Abdullah Shaik, Anwar Said
arXiv:2511. 04539v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In network neuroscience, functional brain systems are often characterized using separate yet related graph-theoretic or spectral descriptors, overlooking how these properties covary and partially overlap across individuals and conditions.
By Subati Abulikemu, Tiago Azevedo, Michail Mamalakis, John Suckling
The paper evaluates deep learning models for electrocardiogram‑based emotion recognition, focusing on generalization across datasets rather than dataset‑specific performance. It introduces two open‑source tools—ARRC for standardized benchmarking and ARDT for inter‑dataset training—to merge three public AER datasets (CUADS, ASCERTAIN, DREAMER) into a more variable benchmark. Using these tools, the authors compare three prominent deep learning architectures and two CNN baselines with hyperparameter tuning and 10‑fold cross‑validation, revealing trade‑offs between accuracy and model complexity and providing a reproducible benchmark for future research.
By Timothy C Sweeney-Fanelli, Ajan Ahmed, Masudul Imtiaz
arXiv:2401. 14381v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose two graph neural network layers for graphs with features in a Riemannian manifold.
By Martin Hanik, Gabriele Steidl, Christoph von Tycowicz
arXiv:2602. 10031v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are commonly divided into message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) and spectral GNNs, reflecting two largely separate research traditions in machine learning and signal processing.
By Antonis Vasileiou, Juan Cervino, Pascal Frossard, Charilaos I. Kanatsoulis, Christopher Morris, Michael T. Schaub, Pierre Vandergheynst, Zhiyang Wang, Guy Wolf, Ron Levie
arXiv:2609.37057v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Achieving strong performance with graph neural networks (GNNs) typically requires training and hyperparameter tuning for each dataset, incurring repeat...
By Dooho Lee, Jinmo Lee, Minho Jeong, Kijung Shin, Jaemin Yoo
arXiv:2607. 00671v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graphs are a complex and versatile data structure used across various domains, with possibly multi-label nodes playing a particularly crucial role.
By Yifei Sun, Zemin Liu, Bryan Hooi, Yang Yang, Rizal Fathony, Jia Chen, Bingsheng He
arXiv:2601. 17469v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable capabilities in learning from graph-structured data with various applications such as social analysis and bioinformatics.
By Wei Ju, Wei Zhang, Siyu Yi, Zhengyang Mao, Yifan Wang, Jingyang Yuan, Zhiping Xiao, Ziyue Qiao, Ming Zhang
arXiv:2412. 19419v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph neural networks are deep neural networks designed for graphs with attributes attached to nodes or edges.
By James H. Tanis, Chris Giannella, Adrian V. Mariano, Daoud Meerzaman