arXiv Machine Learning

Learning-Augmented Optimization for Strategic Two-Echelon Spare Parts Network Design

The paper presents a conservative learning‑augmented framework for designing a two‑echelon spare‑parts inventory network. It combines a graph neural network ensemble, variable neighborhood search, and set‑partitioning recombination to select cluster centers while limiting optimistic surrogate errors. In a case study on Amazon’s North American fulfillment network, the method achieves a 30.5% increase in combined savings over an exact‑evaluation baseline while preserving 99.8% service levels.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 21

Graph Neural Network-based Algorithm Selection for the Traveling Salesman Problem: A Systematic Study of Cost and Rank Losses under Distinct Budget Regimes

Automated Algorithm Selection (AS) aims to improve problem-solving performance by selecting, for each problem instance, the most suitable algorithm from a predefined portfolio. This is particularly relevant to the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), where solver performance is strongly instance-dependent.

arXiv AI
Aug 14

SSPO: Structure-Aware Similarity-Weighted Preference Optimization for Neural Combinatorial Optimization

arXiv:2608. 12443v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) relies on parallel solution sampling for training, yet existing methods fail to fully exploit the rich information latent in a co-sampled solution group.

By Yuanyu Li, Jintao Xu, Zijiang Liu, Yongzhi Qi, Ningxuan Kang, Jianshen Zhang, Wei Qi, Chen Xie, Zuo-Jun Max Shen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Deep Reinforcement Learning on Item-Compatibility Graphs for One-Dimensional Bin Packing

The paper introduces a novel end‑to‑end, size‑agnostic graph reinforcement learning framework for the one‑dimensional bin packing problem (1D‑BPP). It models packing as a Markov decision process on an item‑compatibility graph, where a graph neural network actor‑critic policy learns to merge compatible partial bins. Empirical results on the BPPLIB benchmark show that the learned policy reduces the mean optimality gap of a constructive heuristic from 2.66 % to 2.31 %, performs competitively against other learned methods, and outperforms a state‑of‑the‑art learned solver on the hardest benchmark family.

By M. Asl{\i} Ayd{\i}n
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

OD-Gear: Online Decomposition and Group Sampling for Expert-Guided Adversarial Routing in Scalable Capacitated Vehicle Routing

arXiv:2602. 00488v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Solving large-scale capacitated vehicle routing problems (CVRP) is hindered by the high complexity of classical heuristics and the limited generalization of neural solvers.

By Dongbin Jiao, Zisheng Chen, Xianyi Wang, Jintao Shi, Shengcai Liu, Shi Yan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Benchmarking Tabular Foundation Models as Surrogates in Expensive Evolutionary Optimization

The paper evaluates the Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) as a surrogate model in surrogate‑assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) for expensive optimization problems. Through extensive experiments in both offline and online settings across a range of problem types—including single‑objective, multi‑objective, constrained, combinatorial, mixed‑variable, and engineering tasks—the study finds that TabPFN’s effectiveness varies strongly with the problem characteristics. The authors conclude that TabPFN should be used selectively, with customized model management and algorithm design tailored to data availability, landscape complexity, and search‑space properties.

By Lu Han, Jin Wang, Yuchen Li, Haoran Gu, Shulei Liu, Ziyang Shi, Wenao Lu, Handing Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

When Does Learning Beat Heuristics? A Case Study in Kubernetes Scheduler Score Plugins

The study investigates whether learned scoring functions can outperform hand‑tuned heuristics in Kubernetes node‑selection. Two models—a Random Forest on engineered features and a graph neural network on job dependency graphs—were trained on a large production trace; both achieved modest regression gains (R²≈0.042) but lagged behind a simple free‑CPU heuristic in Top‑1 ranking accuracy (65‑66% vs. 74‑84%). The authors attribute this gap to objective mismatch, noting that pointwise regression rather than a ranking‑specific loss likely limits performance.

By Wang Xuying, Zhibek Sarypbekova