arXiv:2607. 01794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the rapid development of autonomous aerial systems, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in applications such as inspection, environmental monitoring, and rescue, creating growing demand for reliable autonomous navigation.
By Shenghui Zhang, YuXuan Gao, Songwei Zhao, Jifeng Hu, Zijing Zhang, Hechang Chen
arXiv:2506. 22423v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) depend on onboard sensors for perception, navigation, and control.
By Pritam Dash, Ethan Chan, Nathan P. Lawrence, Karthik Pattabiraman
arXiv:2606. 10228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe exploration is a prerequisite for deploying reinforcement learning (RL) agents in safety-critical domains.
By Kaustubh Mani, Yann Pequignot, Vincent Mai, Liam Paull
The paper presents a robust multi‑agent reinforcement learning framework for small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) to maintain separation assurance when GPS data is degraded or spoofed. By modeling state observation corruption as a zero‑sum game, the authors derive a closed‑form adversarial perturbation that eliminates iterative inner optimization and can be evaluated in linear time. Integrating this perturbation into a policy‑gradient MARL algorithm yields a counter‑policy that achieves near‑zero collision rates in high‑density simulations even with up to 35% observation corruption, outperforming non‑adversarial baselines.
By Alex Zongo, Filippos Fotiadis, Ufuk Topcu, Peng Wei
The paper introduces Reward Ensemble under Confidence (REC), a probabilistic reward learning framework for preference-based reinforcement learning that models per‑timestep reward uncertainty using an ensemble of distributional reward models. REC incorporates uncertainty into the preference loss and uses model disagreement to drive exploration, achieving 88.4% of shaped‑reward performance on acrobatic quadrotor control versus 55.2% with standard Preference PPO. The authors train policies in simulation and transfer them zero‑shot to real quadrotors, demonstrating complex acrobatic maneuvers learned solely from human preference feedback, and validate REC on a continuous‑control benchmark.
By Colin Merk, Ismail Geles, Jiaxu Xing, Angel Romero, Giorgia Ramponi, Davide Scaramuzza
arXiv:2608.06481v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Synthesizing safe and robust neural controllers in simulation for reliable sim-to-real deployment remains a critical challenge in robotics. E...
By Riccardo Curcio, Hongpeng Cao, Marco Caccamo
arXiv:2410. 24035v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generating robust and reactive manipulation strategies that can adapt to changing context information is a challenging task in robotics.
By Tim R. Winter, Leonard Kl\"upfel, Ashok M. Sundaram, Werner Friedl, Maximo A. Roa, Freek Stulp, Jo\~ao Silv\'erio
arXiv:2506. 21129v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) increasingly rely on reinforcement learning (RL) for navigation.
By Deepak Kumar Panda, Adolfo Perrusquia, Weisi Guo
The paper introduces an adaptive Robust Markov Decision Process framework for autonomous Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance missions using Collaborative Combat Aircraft. It models adversarial uncertainty with finite threat prototypes and refines policies by eliminating inconsistent threat models, enabling a shift from worst‑case protection to more efficient mission strategies while preserving robustness. Experiments demonstrate higher mission rewards and fewer exposure events compared to nominal and static robust planners across various network topologies.
By Jimin Choi, Max Z. Li
The paper introduces LEAP-CBF, a safety filter that uses Least‑Effort Adversarial Potentials to quantify how much disturbance effort is needed to cause failure in nonlinear dynamical systems. LEAP serves as a control barrier function for the undisturbed system and can be combined with a robust safety filter that tolerates disturbances with bounded cumulative effort. The authors develop a deep reinforcement learning method to construct LEAPs and validate their effectiveness through simulations of multi‑agent systems and hardware experiments on a quadruped and quadrotors.
By Oswin So, Eric Yu, Chuchu Fan
This tutorial paper reviews a decade of advances at the intersection of machine learning and control, focusing on methods that blend machine learning flexibility with control theory’s structure to create capable, reliable, and safe autonomous systems. It covers core concepts for stability and safety, learning dynamics models to handle uncertainty, and data‑driven policy synthesis techniques such as reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and Bayesian optimization. Representative applications and open challenges are discussed, and the authors provide implementations, examples, and additional resources on their website.
By Angela P. Schoellig, Matthias A. M\"uller, Sebastian Trimpe, Melanie N. Zeilinger, Mahathi Anand, Andrea Carron, Oliver Hausd\"orfer, Victor G. Lopez, Friedrich Solowjow, Haocheng Zhao, Siqi Zhou
The paper presents a curriculum‑based adversarial heterogeneous agent reinforcement learning (HARL‑AC) approach for autonomous quad‑copter landing on a ship deck in maritime settings. Using Heterogeneous‑Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (HAPPO) in NVIDIA Isaac Lab, the authors train a cooperative control policy that outperforms domain‑randomized baselines, achieving up to 97.5% success on in‑distribution sea states and higher median success and lower crash rates on out‑of‑distribution sea states. The adversarially trained policy also exhibits more cautious behavior, slightly increasing timeouts but improving safety in severe, unseen conditions.
By Allan Minh-Tam Nguyen, Sree Showrya Kotala, Stefan Banioi-Crijman, Kurt Driessens, Rico M\"ockel