arXiv AI

Function Lives Where Variance Doesn't: Task-Weighted Charts of a Language Model's Computation

The paper introduces task‑weighted charts, a method that defines low‑dimensional coordinate systems based on a chosen functional of a language model’s representation. Using these charts, the authors show that next‑token prediction requires 70–90% of the residual stream’s width to maintain perplexity, a width largely unused by variance‑based analyses. The study demonstrates that charts trained under the functional’s metric preserve predictions better than variance‑based or optimal linear compression when only a few dimensions are retained.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Models

The paper argues that large language models cannot achieve perfect reliability for any task, even with unlimited scale. It establishes that each generative task has an inherent reliability ceiling set by how much output uncertainty can be resolved from observable context, with a resolvable part that can be improved by more context and a subjective part tied to task ambiguity. The authors derive a scaling law showing that performance is limited by the scarcer resource—either training data or model capacity—and explain how this law explains phenomena such as retrieval augmentation and catastrophic forgetting.

By Subhabrata Majumdar
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 15

Hierarchical Latent Structures in Data Generation Process Unify Mechanistic Phenomena across Scale

arXiv:2603. 06592v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contemporary studies in mechanistic interpretability have uncovered many puzzling phenomena in the neural information processing of Transformer-based language models, such as induction heads, function vectors, and the Hydra effect.

By Jonas Rohweder, Subhabrata Dutta, Iryna Gurevych
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

How Perturbations Propagate: A Multi-Level Analysis of Robustness in Large Language Models

The paper investigates how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations affect decoder‑only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden‑state geometry, and attention‑head function. Using GPT‑2 and Qwen2.5 checkpoints, the authors analyze layerwise geometry with centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention‑head responses in GPT‑2. They find that perturbation types produce distinct metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and vary across checkpoints, highlighting the need for multi‑level evaluation of robustness.

arXiv AI
Jul 28

Hierarchical Grading in Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 22757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Graded Large Language Models (GLLMs), an algebraic framework that equips the representation space of a transformer with a grading and propagates the induced weighted scalar action through embeddings, self-attention, and the training objective.

By T. Shaska