A major issue in Security Operations Centers (SOCs) is alert fatigue, as the number of detections reported is more than staff can triage in a given day. Prior work prompts or fine-tunes large language models (LLMs) to emit a triage label directly, but does not train them to reason about whether a detection is a genuine threat.
arXiv:2510. 14113v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are transforming everyday applications, yet deployment in cybersecurity lags due to a lack of high-quality, domain-specific models and training datasets.
By Matan Levi, Daniel Ohayon, Ariel Blobstein, Ravid Sagi, Ian Molloy, Yair Allouche
CoGReV is a hybrid framework that enhances machine‑learning phishing classifiers with a post‑hoc, non‑monotonic reasoning layer written in Answer Set Programming. It uses a confidence‑gated defeasible rule to revise low‑confidence phishing predictions toward legitimate only when website metadata is available, thereby allocating uncertain decisions to the reasoning layer while leaving confident ones to the classifier. The gated rule reduces false positives by 0.27 % of decisions and maintains recall within 0.7 % of the baseline, operating in linear time.
By Mainak Sen, Kumar Sankar Ray, Amlan Chakrabarti
arXiv:2606. 27091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs fine-tuned for security classification are usually evaluated on held-out examples from the same distribution as their training data.
By Ryan Fetterman
arXiv:2609.33401v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Model-based judges support agent security by detecting prompt injections, assessing interaction risks, and screening harmful requests. System...
By Yixuan Liu
arXiv:2609.36254v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are commonly trained with reinforcement learning (RL) to improve their generation of chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning bef...
By Xiangyu Zhou, Saleh Zare Zade, Rafi Ibn Sultan, Alexander Kotov, Dongxiao Zhu
arXiv:2609.24710v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in cybersecurity, where accurate analysis often requires multi-step and context-dependent reasonin...
By Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Antti Hakkala, Seppo Virtanen, Jouni Isoaho
The paper evaluates three AI model security scanners—ModelScan, ModelAudit, and Fickling—using a benchmark of 170 Pickle and PyTorch artifacts from 145 families, 135 of which have binary security labels. It distinguishes coverage metrics such as non‑N/A coverage, analysis completion, and definitive security decisions, finding that ModelAudit achieved 100% definitive decisions, Fickling 81.5%, and ModelScan 49.6%. When a definitive judgment was made, ModelScan reached perfect precision, recall, and F1, while Fickling added no unique true positives beyond those found by the other tools.
By Qianlong Lan, Vinothini Pandurangan, Anuj Kaul, Indranil Sanyal
arXiv:2606. 18166v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classifying Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) using MITRE Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge (ATT&CK) is essential for proactive defense, but historically required extensive human effort.
By Ahmed Ryan, Saad Sakib Noor, Md Erfan, Shaswata Mitra, Sudip Mittal, Md Rayhanur Rahman
The paper introduces a counterfactually anchored evidence attribution approach for multi‑turn large language model safety failures. It presents a new dataset of 1,762 conversations, including adversarial, benign twins, and high‑risk vocabulary variants, and trains a lightweight hierarchical model that accurately predicts safety violations and attributes them to specific user turns and token spans. The model achieves high detection performance (F1 = 0.988) and significantly reduces adversarial confidence when top‑attributed tokens are removed, while maintaining low false‑positive rates on benign conversations.
By Srinivasan Subramanian, Kazi Aminul Islam, Md. Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
arXiv:2607. 17575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose ARBITER, a novel LLM guardrail framework that introduces two key ideas: (i) dual-hypothesis reasoning, a reasoning method for LLM guardrails that explicitly considers both safe and unsafe interpretations of a prompt before making a safety decision, and (ii) multi-component supervised fine-tuning (MC-SFT), a structured training loss for reasoning-based guardrails that decomposes LLM outputs into logical components and weights them according to their importance.
By Md Asiful Islam, Mihai Surdeanu
arXiv:2609.22792v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly used for security tasks: vulnerability discovery, exploit reproduction, and patch generation. Improving them at the model...
By Saad Ullah, Yigitcan Kaya, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna, Gianluca Stringhini