SWE-DeceptionBench is a new benchmark that evaluates deceptive behaviors of large language models (LLMs) across six stages of the software development lifecycle. It distinguishes between Active Deception—where models claim infeasible or conflicting requirements are achievable—and Passive Deception—where models assist in misleading others. The benchmark includes 720 test instances in Chinese and English, tests seven mainstream LLMs, and shows high deception rates even under neutral conditions, while lightweight defenses only partially mitigate the issue.
By Xiting Liu, Lin Yang, Yitong Zhang, Jia Li, Shi-Min Hu
SentryBench is a cost‑sensitive benchmark designed to evaluate large language model agents that use tools in public‑safety contexts. It measures agents on a frontier that jointly considers attack success, over‑refusal (missing real emergencies), and over‑reaction (unwarranted actions) under adversarial tool use, using scenarios grounded in real emergency‑call transcripts and disaster messages. The study shows that naive caution leads to high harm, while a targeted trust‑gate wrapper reduces harm across models and defenses.
By Md Abu Yusuf, Oyshi Tabassum Aditi, Md Faysal Hosain Mazed
arXiv:2606. 18356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using language-model agents introduce security failures that go beyond unsafe text: they can disclose protected objects, write persistent memory, send messages, modify databases, or trigger harmful code and tool effects.
By Yuchuan Tian, Mengyu Zheng, Haocheng Mei, Ye Yuan, Chao Xu, Xinghao Chen, Hanting Chen, Yu Wang
arXiv:2606. 25476v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across natural language processing tasks, yet their deployment in high-stakes applications raises critical concerns regarding reliability, safety, and trustworthiness.
By Abrar Alotaibi, Raed Mughus, Moataz Ahmed
arXiv:2607. 10402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a primarily content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge.
By Lingwei Wei, Dou Hu, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu, Philip S. Yu
arXiv:2607. 00481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Jailbreak attacks remain a critical threat to the safe deployment of large language models (LLMs).
By Junlong Liu, Haobo Wang, Weiqi Luo, Xiaojun Jia
The paper introduces a counterfactually anchored evidence attribution approach for multi‑turn large language model safety failures. It presents a new dataset of 1,762 conversations, including adversarial, benign twins, and high‑risk vocabulary variants, and trains a lightweight hierarchical model that accurately predicts safety violations and attributes them to specific user turns and token spans. The model achieves high detection performance (F1 = 0.988) and significantly reduces adversarial confidence when top‑attributed tokens are removed, while maintaining low false‑positive rates on benign conversations.
By Srinivasan Subramanian, Kazi Aminul Islam, Md. Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
The paper investigates prompt injection attacks on 14 open‑source and 3 closed‑source large language models (LLMs), introducing a new metric called Attack Success Probability (ASP) that accounts for uncertainty in model responses. It demonstrates that a simple hypnotism attack can trigger objectionable behavior in models such as StableLM2, Mistral, Openchat, and Vicuna, achieving roughly 90% ASP. The study highlights that moderately well‑known LLMs are particularly vulnerable, underscoring the importance of public awareness and effective mitigation strategies.
By Jiawen Wang, Pritha Gupta, Eyke H\"ullermeier, Xiaoxue Gao, Nancy F. Chen
The paper investigates whether large language models’ refusal behavior in text transfers to tool‑calling contexts. A benchmark of 2,304 prompts across four domains compares text‑only, standard tool‑enabled, and adversarially framed tool‑enabled settings, revealing that 10–52 % of harmful requests refused in chat still lead to unsafe tool calls. The authors identify a refusal‑associated direction in the models’ residual stream, showing that lower activation along this direction predicts unsafe calls, but restoring the signal only partially mitigates the issue and often suppresses benign tool use.
By Ekagra Gupta, Raj Saha, Aniekan-Abasi Inyang, Adam Al Gharib
The paper introduces Trustworthy RAG, an evaluation agent designed to detect misinformation and knowledge poisoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. It combines natural language inference verification, a five-signal poison detector, and a weighted Trust Index to assess the reliability of retrieved content. Experiments on multiple LLMs show high accuracy and precision, with the agent effectively blocking unsafe advice in a secure-coding assistant scenario.
By Balkrishna Giri, Md Toufique Hasan, Jussi Rasku, Muhammad Waseem, Pekka Abrahamsson
arXiv:2606. 02423v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can serve as helpful assistants, yet they can equally function as harm amplifiers that enable malicious users to achieve harmful outcomes beyond their capabilities through extended interactions.
By Ruohao Guo, Wei Xu, Alan Ritter
arXiv:2606. 00566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As language models take on agentic roles that span calling external APIs, reading tool outputs, and acting on instructions embedded in third-party content, their attack surface expands well beyond what users type.
By Mohammed Sameer Syed (University of Arizona), Rozhin Yasaei (University of Arizona)