The paper reviews four studies that combine blockchain and AI to secure data sharing, model integrity, and autonomous decision-making in distributed systems. It highlights how blockchain’s immutability, decentralized consensus, and verifiable provenance can address trust gaps in training data, real‑time monitoring, and automated code remediation. The authors propose a layered architecture integrating hardened models, blockchain‑anchored provenance, AI anomaly detection, and smart‑contract‑governed multi‑agent remediation, and outline open challenges in scalability, privacy‑transparency trade‑offs, and governance.
By Harsh Verma
arXiv:2606. 23768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose cryptographic certificates of validity for agentic AI systems.
By Murdoch J. Gabbay
arXiv:2605. 20531v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable verification of proofs remains a bottleneck for training and evaluating AI systems on hard mathematical reasoning.
By Slim Barkallah, Luke Bailey, Kaiyue Wen, Mohammed Abouzaid, Tengyu Ma
arXiv:2608.28433v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Proof assistants such as Lean 4 promise the paradigm of formally verified mathematics, but large-scale formalization projects have faced major barr...
By Shuze Chen, Kunal Marwaha, Xiaoyang Lu, Henry Yuen, Tianyi Peng
arXiv:2607. 09217v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this system paper, we present OpenProver, an open-source system for LLM-driven automated theorem proving (ATP) with integrated Lean 4 formal verification.
By Mat\v{e}j Kripner, Milan Straka
arXiv:2608. 13522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly used for programming, but do not provide any guarantee on the correctness of generated code.
By Zhe Ye, Hantao Lou, Yuechun Sun, Peiyang Song, Zhengxu Yan, Timothe Kasriel, Qingyang Zhang, Kaiyu Yang, Soonho Kong, Jingxuan He, Dawn Song
AI agents are increasingly used for programming, but do not provide any guarantee on the correctness of generated code. Verified code generation, in which an agent produces both an implementation and a machine-checked proof of its specification, offers a stronger path toward trustworthy AI-generated software.
HybridProver is a unified framework that combines whole-proof synthesis and tactic-based generation using proof sketches as an intermediate representation. Implemented in Isabelle/HOL, it employs two 7B-scale LLMs trained on optimized Isabelle datasets. On the miniF2F Isabelle benchmark, HybridProver achieved a 73.8% success rate, surpassing the previous state of the art of 61.9%, and ablation studies examined the effects of dataset quality, training settings, and sampling strategies.
By Jilin Hu, Jianyu Zhang, Yongwang Zhao, Talia Ringer
arXiv:2607. 06341v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Formal verification offers the strongest guarantee of software correctness, but it does not scale: the proofs demanded by interactive theorem provers such as Coq require enormous expert effort.
By Shuangxiang Kan, Shuanglong Kan, Sebastian Ertel
Cogentic is a multi‑agent system designed to automate proof discovery for open research problems. It uses an iterative prove‑verify loop where an orchestrator assigns independent provers to different proof directions, verifies their outputs with specialized components, and records confirmed intermediate results in a persistent ledger for future rounds. Built on Gemini, Cogentic has produced novel results on five open problems in online learning, auction theory, and mechanism design, each verified by domain experts and detailed in companion papers.
By Yang Cai, Vineet Gupta, Yanchen Jiang, Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, Grigoris Velegkas, Di Wang
Stellar Colosseum is a model‑agnostic harness designed to improve long‑horizon research in mathematics and theoretical computer science by allocating inference across multiple agents. It explores alternative strategies before constructing proofs, uses a readiness gate to decide when a route is mature enough to decompose, represents proof plans as interdependent subproblems, and routes verifier findings back to the relevant part of the argument. The workflow generates candidates in parallel, attacks them with targeted falsification, and combines candidates and critiques into a single research artifact through overlapping random‑sample tree aggregation, and has been integrated into Google Antigravity's Teamwork framework as the Long Proof pattern. Demonstrations show that, when paired with Gemini 3.1 Pro, Stellar Colosseum achieves 71.0% accuracy on the TCS‑Bench theorem‑proving benchmark and solves 218 of 222 Codeforces problems.
By Honghao Lin, David P. Woodruff, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Song Zuo, Vahab Mirrokni
arXiv:2512. 13666v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The security and decentralization of Proof-of-Work (PoW) have been well-tested in existing blockchain systems.
By Weihang Cao, Mustafa Doger, Sennur Ulukus