arXiv:2606. 29563v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel at complex tasks like question answering and summarization, thanks to their ability to handle long-context inputs.
By Shuvendu Roy, Mengyao Zhai, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Golnoosh Samei
arXiv:2510. 16882v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a commonly used technique to adapt large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks.
By Heming Zou, Yixiu Mao, Yun Qu, Qi Wang, Xiangyang Ji
arXiv:2511. 12309v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-consistency (SC) is a widely used test-time inference technique for improving performance in chain-of-thought reasoning.
By Austin Feng, Marius Alonso, Ambroise Odonnat, Vasilii Feofanov, Ievgen Redko
arXiv:2508. 06133v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study offline scheduling for large language model (LLM) serving under a fixed KV-cache memory budget, where requests have heterogeneous prompt (prefill) and response (decode) lengths.
By Meixuan Wang, Yinyu Ye, Zijie Zhou
arXiv:2606. 23961v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-context and agentic LLM workloads push the KV cache past any fixed memory budget, forcing the inference stack to permanently evict tokens at every step of a continuous-inference stream.
By Duc Duong, Hoang Anh Duy Le, Jianwen Xie, Anshumali Shrivastava, Zhaozhuo Xu
arXiv:2605. 08696v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Over the last two decades, language modeling has experienced a shift from the use of predominantly recurrent architectures that process tokens sequentially during training and inference to non-recurrent models that process sequence elements in parallel during training, which results in greater training efficiency and stability at the expense of lower inference throughput.
By Benjamin L. Badger
arXiv:2607. 00510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowing which training examples drive outputs is fundamental to auditing, correcting, and understanding language models, yet for modern LLMs this remains expensive, approximate, and largely post-hoc.
By Dan Ley, Giang Nguyen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Julius Adebayo
arXiv:2607. 06974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly improve their reasoning at test time via additional computation, yet most existing works treat each problem in isolation.
By Ruilin Tong, Dong Gong
arXiv:2605. 03644v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many-Shot In-Context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a promising paradigm, leveraging extensive examples to unlock the reasoning potential of Large Language Models (LLMs).
By Jie Ou, Jinyu Guo, Shiyao Guo, Yuang Li, Ruiqi Wu, Zhaokun Wang, Wenyi Li, Wenhong Tian
arXiv:2606. 30190v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing domain-incremental learning (DIL) strategies call for massive amounts of data to adapt to new domains and suffer from the overfitting problem in the case of data scarcity.
By Naeem Paeedeh, Mahardhika Pratama, Wolfgang Mayer, Mukesh Prasad, Weiping Ding, Yew-Soon Ong
arXiv:2606. 07527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The prevailing paradigm for training LLMs has evolved to rely on a massive post-training phase consisting of SFT and RL.
By Michael Hassid, Yossi Adi, Roy Schwartz
Large language model (LLM) agents require post-training methods that can improve long-horizon decision making from environment feedback. However, existing agentic post-training pipelines often treat data curation as a fixed preprocessing step, focusing mainly on data augmentation while neglecting filtering, refinement, and adaptation to downstream failures.