arXiv:2609.05916v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve strong multimodal understanding, but the hundreds to thousands of visual tokens they process impose subs...
By Yichen Guo, Tinghao Wang, Qizhe Zhang, Lingbei Meng, Yuan Zhang, Jiajun Cao, Hao Jiang, Chenwei Wu, Jixian Wu, Sixiang Chen, Tao Luo, Hongyang Cheng, Kai Tang, Chenxi Li, Renyuan Li, Xiande Huang, Wenya Wang, Shanghang Zhang
The paper shows that only a small subset of attention heads in vision-language models is responsible for selecting critical visual tokens. By pruning tokens based on similarity before LLM reasoning and then applying head‑aware pruning during reasoning, the proposed ProViP framework achieves high task performance with significant speedups. Experiments on LLaVA‑1.5‑7B demonstrate 95.9% performance retention and a 1.62× inference speedup at an 88.9% pruning ratio.
By Chaofang Ma, Lin Jiang, Carol Jingyi Li, Xingyu Liu, Zeyu Li, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang
LearnPruner rethinks token pruning in vision‑language models by addressing shortcomings of attention mechanisms in vision encoders and large language models. The method uses a two‑stage approach: first a learnable pruning module removes redundant vision tokens after the vision encoder, then only task‑relevant tokens are kept in the LLM’s middle layer. Experiments show that LearnPruner retains about 95% of performance while using only 5.5% of vision tokens, achieving a 3.2× speed‑up.
By Rinyoichi Takezoe, Yaqian Li, Zihao Bo, Anzhou Hou, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long
The paper introduces Adaptive Visual Token Pruning (AVTP), a training‑free framework that dynamically selects pruning layers and ratios for large vision‑language models (LVLMs) when processing multiple image sequences. By analyzing visual attention distributions across different LVLM architectures, AVTP adapts token retention to image importance, enabling efficient inference without relying on attention‑based computations incompatible with FlashAttention. Experiments show significant speedups—up to 2× for Qwen3VL‑8B—while preserving or even improving accuracy on multi‑image benchmarks.
By Rongyang Zhang, Chengqiang Lu, Cong Li, Hongchao Gu, Tingjia Shen, Xuyang Zhi, Qimeng Wang, Yan Gao, Yi Wu, Yao Hu, Hao Wang, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2609.36916v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) incur high inference latency from long visual token sequences. Existing pruning methods commonly use attention...
By Weixuan Li, Zikun Zhou, Xinyi Zhuang, Xinyan Guo, Rui Tian, Chuyao Zhang, Lin Gao
arXiv:2609.37581v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual understanding and reasoning but often incur substantial inference costs due to the large number of visu...
By Jing Wang, Zhiping Wu, Dongdong Ren, Youfang Han, Wei Zhao, Wenbin Li
arXiv:2610.03389v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision language models (VLMs) incur substantial inference cost because every visual token is processed by the attention and MLP projections of every...
By Rahul Chowdhury, Timothy A Rupprecht, Xuan Shen, Shaoyi Huang, Pu Zhao, Yanzhi Wang
The paper introduces STD, a hierarchical token pruning framework for Large Vision‑Language Models that aligns pruning strategies with the functional roles of different network stages. By using high‑frequency spectral analysis in shallow layers, Gaussian‑smoothed attention in intermediate layers, and a stability‑adaptive trigger in deep layers, STD preserves essential visual information while aggressively reducing token counts. Experiments demonstrate that STD outperforms existing pruning methods, achieving up to 94.4% token reduction and a 3.9× speed‑up on LLaVA‑NeXT‑7B.
By Shuo Zhang, Jintao Tong, Yixiong Zou, Yuhua Li, Ruixuan Li
arXiv:2608. 07088v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) encode images as long visual token sequences, making prefilling and KV-cache storage expensive.
By Qiyanhui Lu, Han Wu, Rongjian Xu, Tingzhang Luo, Cheng Fan, Xinghao Chen, Minjing Dong, Jufeng Yang, Jianyuan Guo
ET‑Prune is a training‑free framework that dynamically allocates visual token budgets in multimodal large language models based on question‑conditioned evidence. It protects text‑like spatial regions, converts evidence uncertainty into a token floor, and progressively prunes concentrated evidence while retaining diffuse or text‑dense tokens. In six backbone‑benchmark comparisons, ET‑Prune matches or outperforms other pruned methods while keeping roughly half the visual tokens, achieving notable gains on OCRBench‑v2 and MMBench v1.1.
By Zizhong Ding, Junxian Li, Kai Liu, Shaoqiu Zhang, Xiao Xiao, Linghe Kong, Yulun Zhang
QCPruner is a training‑free visual token pruning method that conditions both token selection and representation on the query via bilateral utility weighting. It fuses keyword‑matched query anchors with cross‑modal cues to compute a nonnegative facility‑location objective that is monotone and submodular, guaranteeing a (1‑1/e) greedy approximation. Across multiple multimodal large language models, QCPruner consistently outperforms existing pruning methods, achieving over 96% of unpruned performance even with very few tokens retained.
By Shengli He (Guizhou University), Yongchao Liang (Guizhou University), Roumeng He (Shanghai Ocean University), Junjie Zeng (Guizhou University), Jiyuan He (Guizhou University), Can Wu (Guizhou University), Li Zheng (Guizhou University)
arXiv:2609.01224v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Visual token pruning reduces the inference overhead of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by retaining only a subset of visual tokens. Existing m...
By Yuanyuan Jia, Shunpu Tang, Qianqian Yang