The paper investigates the origin of the word "wait" in reasoning models, arguing that it is inherited from training data rather than invented by reinforcement learning (RL). By analyzing training histories and using label‑free metrics, the authors show that RL improves accuracy without adding the marker, while the marker appears during mid‑training or fine‑tuning on reasoning traces. They also demonstrate that marker frequency alone does not prove RL‑induced reasoning and warn against relying on automated judges for evaluation.
arXiv:2607. 16097v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to improving large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks, yet RL post-training is largely studied in isolation from the pretraining that precedes it.
arXiv:2605. 24396v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long chains of thought (CoT) from current language models frequently contain logical gaps and unjustified leaps, limiting the gains from additional test-time compute.
arXiv:2605.11467v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reasoning models post-hoc rationalize answers they have already committed to internally, producing chains of *reasoning theater*: deliberativ...
arXiv:2607. 20952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent, or silent, reasoning lets language models carry out intermediate computation in continuous vector space instead of words, and is widely assumed to function as an internal scratchpad the model actively consults during inference.
arXiv:2507.14843v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances highlight Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) as a promising approach to enhancing LLM capabilities. However, it...
arXiv:2607. 26119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models trained via reinforcement learning (RL) have been increasingly shown to outperform their supervised fine-tuned (SFT) counterparts on mathematical reasoning tasks; Yet the mechanistic basis for this advantage remains unclear.
arXiv:2607. 02869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving mathematical reasoning in language models.
arXiv:2605. 02909v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a powerful approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
arXiv:2606. 11709v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) provides dense, token-level supervision for reasoning models by aligning a model's own distribution with the distribution it produces under privileged context, typically a verified solution.
arXiv:2610.02015v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in LLM reasoning models---driven primarily by the paradigm of post-training via reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR)-...
arXiv:2607. 05394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training.
The paper introduces a self‑distillation method that leverages answer‑only data to improve large language models (LLMs) after training. By training an inverse reasoning LLM to generate latent chain‑of‑thought traces conditioned on the answer, the authors can perform offline distillation that significantly boosts performance on hard prompts for tasks like Countdown and GSM8K. Additionally, the inverse model serves as an accurate verifier, enhancing best‑of‑n selection accuracy.