arXiv AI
Jun 30
Aligning Language Model Benchmarks with Pairwise Preferences
arXiv:2602. 02898v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language model benchmarks are pervasive and computationally-efficient proxies for real-world performance.
D2VBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Value Dilemmas in Daily Scenarios
With the wide application of large language models (LLMs) in real-world scenarios, the value implication of their outputs is crucial. However, existing evaluation benchmarks suffer from insufficient coverage of value dilemmas in daily scenarios involving multiple value conflicts and simplistic evaluation formalisms that fail to assess LLMs' value alignment.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 10
RankLLM: Weighted Ranking of LLMs by Quantifying Question Difficulty
arXiv:2602. 12424v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Benchmarks establish a standardized evaluation framework to systematically assess the performance of large language models (LLMs), facilitating objective comparisons and driving advancements in the field.
arXiv AI
Jun 8
VALUEFLOW: Toward Pluralistic and Steerable Value-based Alignment in Large Language Models
arXiv:2602. 03160v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with the diverse spectrum of human values remains a central challenge: preference-based methods often fail to capture deeper motivational principles.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 23
When Trivia Is Not Trivial: Everyday Knowledge Failures in Multilingual LLMs
Quiz rooms, trivia nights, and quiz shows challenge human knowledge across a wide range of topics, from canonical facts to everyday culture. In this paper, we examine whether large language models (LLMs) can perform competitively in such settings, using quiz-style questions to test them on both common and niche topics.
arXiv AI
Jun 26
NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Models
arXiv:2606. 27047v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but ensuring their reliability in highly technical domains remains a significant challenge.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook
arXiv:2604. 06210v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As LLMs are globally deployed, aligning their cultural value orientations is critical for safety and user engagement.
arXiv AI
1d ago
Leveraging Machine Unlearning for Cost-Efficient Preference Alignment
arXiv:2504. 06659v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite advances in Preference Alignment (PA) for Large Language Models (LLMs), mainstream methods like reinforcement learning with human feedback face notable challenges.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
Toward Preference-aligned Large Language Models via Residual-based Model Steering
arXiv:2509. 23982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference alignment is a critical step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) useful and aligned with (human) preferences.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
PoliticsBench: Benchmarking Political Values in Large Language Models with Multi-Turn Roleplay
arXiv:2603. 23841v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as primary sources of information, their potential for political bias may impact their objectivity.
arXiv AI
6d ago
From Prompting to Behavioral Alignment: Personalized LLM Judges for Recommendation Evaluation
arXiv:2608. 11493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditional offline recommendation evaluation relies heavily on complex, manually maintained feature pipelines that are difficult to scale.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25
Ask, Don't Judge: Binary Questions for Interpretable LLM Evaluation and Self-Improvement
Evaluating LLM outputs remains a major bottleneck in NLP: human evaluation is expensive and slow, lexical metrics correlate poorly with human judgments on open-ended generation, and holistic LLM judges often produce opaque scores that are hard to debug. We propose BINEVAL, a framework that decomposes evaluation criteria into atomic binary questions and aggregates the resulting verdicts into interpretable, multi-dimensional scores.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation
arXiv:2607. 14109v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding.