arXiv Machine Learning

TINNs: Time-Induced Neural Networks for Solving Time-Dependent PDEs

arXiv:2601. 20361v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solve time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) by learning a mesh-free, differentiable solution that can be evaluated anywhere in space and time.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Linearized PINN with pretrained nonlinear layers

The paper introduces a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced‑order neural basis approach for solving forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline phase, lPINN learns continuous, differentiable neural basis functions from numerical solutions, which are then frozen for new problem instances; the online solution is obtained by minimizing the governing‑equation residual with additional constraints. Experiments on advection‑diffusion, Burgers', and nonlinear pendulum equations show that lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors than vanilla PINNs while reducing online inference times by up to three orders of magnitude, and its continuous representation generalizes to finer meshes without retraining.

By Wenhao Chen, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

DAS-PINNs for high-dimensional partial differential equations: extending deep adaptive sampling to spacetime domains

arXiv:2606. 06314v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time-dependent high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) with spatially localised and dynamically evolving solutions pose a fundamental challenge for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), as uniform collocation sampling becomes increasingly ineffective in high-dimensional spatiotemporal domains.

By Anshima Singh, David J. Silvester
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Amortizing Physics-Informed Neural Solvers via Graph Hypernetworks

The paper introduces a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning, especially for high‑reaction and coupled systems.

By Cheng Jing, Abhishek Verma, Kallol Bera, Yixuan He, Kookjin Lee