Scalable Patch-Level Self-Supervised Learning
Self-supervised learning (SSL) at scale produces powerful visual representations. However, most scalable SSL methods rely on ad hoc combinations of multiple objectives and stabilization mechanisms. Ta...
Self-supervised learning (SSL) at scale produces powerful visual representations. However, most scalable SSL methods rely on ad hoc combinations of multiple objectives and stabilization mechanisms. Ta...
AdaDim introduces a training strategy for self‑supervised learning that adaptively balances dimensionality increase and mutual information reduction. By gradually regularizing the projection head while encouraging feature decorrelation and sample uniformity, AdaDim achieves up to 3% performance gains over standard SSL baselines without relying on costly techniques such as queues or predictor networks. The method demonstrates that optimal SSL models do not simply maximize dimensionality or minimize mutual information, but find a trade‑off between the two.
arXiv:2609.38278v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) removes the need for annotations and makes models that are capable across more domains than supervised learning. The aut...
arXiv:2609.38393v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Same-instance self-supervised learning (SSL) learns representations by enforcing consistency across two views of the same underlying instance. This p...
Self-supervision is a powerful technique for learning visual representations from unlabeled data. Existing techniques primarily adopt a two-stage approach for self-supervised learning (SSL): a pretraining stage on unlabeled data followed by a finetuning stage on labeled data.
arXiv:2602. 02381v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Joint-embedding self-supervised learning (SSL), the key paradigm for unsupervised representation learning from visual data, learns from invariances between semantically-related data pairs.
arXiv:2606. 00514v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative modeling and self-supervised representation learning (SSL) optimize structurally different objectives: generative training rewards distributional fidelity, while SSL rewards semantic coherence.
arXiv:2610.09609v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) relies on two core mechanisms: self-training under the Teacher-Student (T-S) framework and joint optimization of labeled...
arXiv:2603. 15553v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The landscape of self-supervised learning (SSL) is currently dominated by generative approaches (e.
arXiv:2605. 23995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for addressing the annotation bottleneck in medical imaging by learning representations from unlabeled data.
The paper reports a controlled study of self‑supervised learning (SSL) objectives for image and video pretraining under limited data, architecture, and compute budgets. It compares contrastive, reconstruction, feature‑prediction, and diffusion methods, finding that DINOv2‑style pretraining delivers the best overall performance. Combining DINOv2 with video SSL objectives such as VideoMAE improves image classification and segmentation but harms video tracking and camera‑pose estimation, highlighting a trade‑off between semantic and geometric learning.
The paper explores contrastive self‑supervised learning (SSL) for retinal fundus image classification, comparing SimSiam and SimCLR under limited data and computational resources. It investigates how retinal‑specific augmentation strategies and training parameters affect representation quality, evaluated through linear probing and fine‑tuning on multi‑disease classification and diabetic retinopathy grading tasks. Results indicate that tailored augmentations enable lightweight SSL models to learn transferable representations, reducing reliance on large annotated datasets while achieving competitive performance.