arXiv AI

Incremental Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Human-in-the-Loop Decision Support

The paper presents iRAG, a human‑in‑the‑loop decision‑support system that blends Retrieval‑Augmented Generation with Hybrid Decision‑Making. Unlike traditional RAG models that rely on static knowledge bases, iRAG starts with an empty KB and incrementally builds it from human decisions, storing past decisions as retrievable precedents. The system progresses from silent observation to evidence‑grounded contestation and ultimately to autonomous handling with abstention, achieving low error rates even under knowledge drift and demonstrating a stability–plasticity trade‑off.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

Why RAGs Hallucinate: Penalty-Aware Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with Knowledge-Gap Canaries

The paper introduces a penalty‑aware evaluation framework for Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems that uses asymmetric scoring, knowledge‑gap canaries, and a failure‑attribution pipeline. Applying this framework to three commercial RAG products and a baseline on SimpleQA‑Verified, the authors find that while overall accuracy is similar across systems, canary violation rates vary dramatically, showing that systems differ more in when they answer than in what they answer. The study demonstrates that penalty‑aware scoring can reorder system rankings and is robust across different penalty settings.

By Alden Do Rosario, Hussein Younes, Felipe Pires
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Assessing the Downstream Utility of Evidence-Aware Retrieval in RAG

The paper investigates whether incorporating an evidence-support signal into retrieval evaluation for retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) improves downstream decision‑making. Across multiple benchmarks and a TREC RAG 2025 setting, the evidence signal alters retriever rankings but its benefits vary: it does not consistently enhance retriever training, its usefulness for system selection depends on generator instructions, and it does not reliably predict answer quality on unseen topics. Human filtering of evidence‑rich passages preserves useful content, yet evaluators disagree on whether this improves final answers, indicating that evidence‑aware evaluation alone does not guarantee better downstream outcomes.

By Utshab Kumar Ghosh, Debayan Mukhopadhyay, Shubham Chatterjee
arXiv AI
Oct 1

BELIEFRAG: Making Adaptive RAG State-Aware under Evolving Evidence

BELIEFRAG is a closed‑loop controller that maintains an explicit evidence state—tracking sufficiency, reliability, conflict, uncertainty, evidence gaps, and acquisition cost—to guide adaptive retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG). By updating this state, it selects among retrieval, query rewriting, verification, answering, stopping, and abstention, achieving higher token‑F1 scores and lower token usage on six QA benchmarks compared to fixed iterative retrieval. The approach shows that corrective re‑retrieval and calibrated answerability are key to its performance gains.

By Hongji Pu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

DynaKRAG: A Unified Framework for Learnable Evidence Control in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

DynaKRAG is a unified framework that learns a state‑conditioned policy to control evidence acquisition in multi‑hop retrieval‑augmented generation. It uses a deterministic validity layer to build an action set, a learned continuation gate to decide between generating an answer or gathering more evidence, and an advantage scorer to rank evidence operations by predicted gain. Across HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and MuSiQue with various backbone models, DynaKRAG achieves top EM and F1 scores, improves token and retrieval efficiency, and enables terminal evidence compression that reduces context size while boosting answer quality.

By Chenyu Zhou, Yaqi Wu, Xiaolei Guo, Jiaqi Huang, Xianfa Zhang, Junxu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Zhubo Shi, Jianghao Lin, Dongdong Ge
arXiv AI
Sep 7

From Interaction Traces to Persistent Skills: Online Evolution for Computer-Use Agents

The paper introduces an online skill‑evolution framework that transforms interaction traces and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures for computer‑use agents. By executing each iteration against a frozen library snapshot, the system updates skills without altering the underlying model parameters. Experiments across four OSWorld domains show that the evolving library consistently outperforms an empty‑library baseline, with gains ranging from 5.7 to 18.6 percentage points, while also revealing domain‑specific temporal stability and challenges in skill retrieval and revision.

By Longtao Hu, Xiao Liang, Linchao Zhu