arXiv:2607. 11267v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In the rapidly evolving landscape of information retrieval systems, the ability to adapt and improve through user feedback is paramount.
By Tatiana Pelc, Gila Kamhi, Asaf Avrahamy, Adi Fledel-Alon
In the rapidly evolving landscape of information retrieval systems, the ability to adapt and improve through user feedback is paramount. This study introduces a novel methodology for refining the performance of a primary Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) system by strategically integrating an auxiliary feedback RAG system.
arXiv:2608. 08237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in production operate under strict service level objectives (SLOs) on tail latency and infrastructure cost.
By Muhammad Faizan Raza (Luna), Shuo (Luna), Yang, Satish Mahadevan Srinivasan
The paper introduces a penalty‑aware evaluation framework for Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems that uses asymmetric scoring, knowledge‑gap canaries, and a failure‑attribution pipeline. Applying this framework to three commercial RAG products and a baseline on SimpleQA‑Verified, the authors find that while overall accuracy is similar across systems, canary violation rates vary dramatically, showing that systems differ more in when they answer than in what they answer. The study demonstrates that penalty‑aware scoring can reorder system rankings and is robust across different penalty settings.
By Alden Do Rosario, Hussein Younes, Felipe Pires
arXiv:2602.13217v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Reasoning benchmarks need renewal along two axes: freshness and headroom. VeRA makes both executable and auditable by turning each item into a task...
By Zerui Cheng, Jiashuo Liu, Chunjie Wu, Jiayang Sun, Jianzhu Yao, Pramod Viswanath, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang
The paper investigates whether incorporating an evidence-support signal into retrieval evaluation for retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) improves downstream decision‑making. Across multiple benchmarks and a TREC RAG 2025 setting, the evidence signal alters retriever rankings but its benefits vary: it does not consistently enhance retriever training, its usefulness for system selection depends on generator instructions, and it does not reliably predict answer quality on unseen topics. Human filtering of evidence‑rich passages preserves useful content, yet evaluators disagree on whether this improves final answers, indicating that evidence‑aware evaluation alone does not guarantee better downstream outcomes.
By Utshab Kumar Ghosh, Debayan Mukhopadhyay, Shubham Chatterjee
arXiv:2606. 26511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) gives agents access to accumulated knowledge, but has no model of time.
By Neeraj Yadav
BELIEFRAG is a closed‑loop controller that maintains an explicit evidence state—tracking sufficiency, reliability, conflict, uncertainty, evidence gaps, and acquisition cost—to guide adaptive retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG). By updating this state, it selects among retrieval, query rewriting, verification, answering, stopping, and abstention, achieving higher token‑F1 scores and lower token usage on six QA benchmarks compared to fixed iterative retrieval. The approach shows that corrective re‑retrieval and calibrated answerability are key to its performance gains.
By Hongji Pu
arXiv:2607. 26071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this work, we propose GuidedRAG, a novel extension to traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that introduces a dedicated selection stage and semantic steering during retrieval.
By Matthijs Jansen op de Haar, Tobias St\"ahle, Lorenzo Gatti
DynaKRAG is a unified framework that learns a state‑conditioned policy to control evidence acquisition in multi‑hop retrieval‑augmented generation. It uses a deterministic validity layer to build an action set, a learned continuation gate to decide between generating an answer or gathering more evidence, and an advantage scorer to rank evidence operations by predicted gain. Across HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and MuSiQue with various backbone models, DynaKRAG achieves top EM and F1 scores, improves token and retrieval efficiency, and enables terminal evidence compression that reduces context size while boosting answer quality.
By Chenyu Zhou, Yaqi Wu, Xiaolei Guo, Jiaqi Huang, Xianfa Zhang, Junxu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Zhubo Shi, Jianghao Lin, Dongdong Ge
arXiv:2606. 28737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce 5ting, our system for the SemEval2026 Task 8 (MTRAGEval), which evaluates multi-turn Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.
By Thien-Qua-T-Nguyen, Chi Hoang, Nguyen Tran, Tri Le, Khanh Truong, Chinh Trong Nguyen
The paper introduces an online skill‑evolution framework that transforms interaction traces and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures for computer‑use agents. By executing each iteration against a frozen library snapshot, the system updates skills without altering the underlying model parameters. Experiments across four OSWorld domains show that the evolving library consistently outperforms an empty‑library baseline, with gains ranging from 5.7 to 18.6 percentage points, while also revealing domain‑specific temporal stability and challenges in skill retrieval and revision.
By Longtao Hu, Xiao Liang, Linchao Zhu