The paper investigates how subject‑level differential privacy (DP) can anonymize EEG‑derived feature representations while preserving clinical utility. It evaluates Gaussian and Laplace perturbations across three deployment scenarios—client‑side, server‑side, and decentralized local training—using statistical utility metrics and a downstream machine‑learning task. Results indicate that DP can be integrated into EEG workflows, but the choice of mechanism, privacy parameters, and sensitivity calibration critically affects data utility, especially in small, imbalanced clinical datasets.
arXiv:2609.00390v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable EEG systems may expose sensitive information beyond their intended health function, creating substantial risks to neuroprivacy. In this work...
arXiv:2607. 28191v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple institutions to train shared models without exchanging raw clinical EEG data, but it does not fully prevent privacy leakage from individual model updates.
arXiv:2607. 06037v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A shared electrocardiogram (ECG) is itself a biometric fingerprint that can re-identify a patient and reveal personal information.
arXiv:2503. 10945v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current practices for reporting differential privacy (DP) guarantees for machine learning (ML) algorithms such as DP-SGD provide an incomplete and potentially misleading picture.
arXiv:2609.36609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis requires careful choices in preprocessing, statistical modeling, and machine learning because EEG signals are h...
The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.
arXiv:2601. 07556v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) face significant deployment challenges due to inter-subject variability, signal non-stationarity, and computational constraints.
arXiv:2606. 11556v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continuous electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring could surface rhythm abnormalities before they escalate into cardiovascular events.
arXiv:2603. 17109v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decoding brain activity into natural language is a major challenge in AI with important applications in assistive communication, neurotechnology, and human-computer interaction.
arXiv:2609.22092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-cost and non-invasive signal source for dementia screening, yet existing EEG-based studies remain difficult to...
arXiv:2508.04800v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce a novel privatization framework for high-dimensional controlled variable selection. Our framework enables rigorous False Discove...
TADP is a temporally adaptive differential privacy framework designed for privacy-preserving video generation with fixed-length clip-replacement adjacency. It employs a dual-branch architecture to separately extract identity and expression representations, applying temporally adaptive Gaussian mechanisms to each branch and using adaptive Rényi Differential Privacy composition to ensure joint release privacy. The framework converts clip-level RDP guarantees to (ε,δ)-differential privacy, applies DP post-processing, and demonstrates reduced identity leakage, good perceptual quality, temporal stability, and high expression recognition utility on facial expression datasets.