MiD-VLM is a multimodal model that detects and grounds global semantic misinformation in image-caption pairs. It combines image-text representations from SigLIP with visual scene features from DINOv2, and adapts Qwen2‑VL‑7B using LoRA to jointly predict authenticity, identify manipulation type, and localize misleading caption tokens. On the DGM4+ validation split, it achieves an F1 score of 0.9679 for binary authenticity classification.
By Tarunya Prasad, Bharatesh Chakravarthi
Video captioning models are increasingly evaluated with metrics designed for single-sentence image captions. We test whether those metrics recover human judgement on dense, multi-window video descript...
DEPICT is a new training‑free metric for evaluating text‑to‑image alignment. It replaces fixed reference answers with an agreement rule that compares image‑based and caption‑only responses, weighting questions by how decisively the caption determines them. By merging this agreement score with a holistic score, DEPICT improves negation accuracy dramatically and outperforms existing training‑free metrics while matching or exceeding fine‑tuned evaluators on several benchmarks.
By Vasco Ramos, Sandra Godinho Silva, Joao Magalhaes, Ricardo Rei, Pedro Henrique Martins
The paper introduces Redemption Score (RS), a multi‑modal evaluation framework for image captioning that combines three complementary signals: Mutual Information Divergence for global image‑text alignment, DINO‑based perceptual similarity of cycle‑generated images for visual grounding, and LLM text embeddings for contextual similarity to human references. RS fuses these signals to provide a more holistic assessment, achieving a Kendall‑τ of 58.42 on Flickr8k and outperforming most prior methods. The framework demonstrates consistent performance across Conceptual Captions and MS COCO, offering a robust evaluation that captures both visual accuracy and text quality.
By Ashim Dahal, Ankit Ghimire, Saydul Akbar Murad, Nick Rahimi
arXiv:2610.33798v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: An image is rarely described only once. Retrieval benchmarks and many collections attach several captions to each picture, yet dual encoders still ju...
By Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Belal Shoer, Abhirama Subramanyam Penamakuri
The paper introduces a position‑aware rubric that breaks down long image captions into atomic visual claims, allowing verification of generated text against these claims and revealing distinct failure modes: unsupported specificity in the middle and vague language at the end. Using this diagnosis, the authors propose PAGER, a reinforcement learning objective that provides separate rewards for middle evidence, tail continuation, claim coverage, and length control. Experiments on detailed‑caption benchmarks show that PAGER improves position‑wise grounding and pairwise caption preference while maintaining overall caption quality.
By Yuanze Hu, Zhichao Yang, Junwei Jing, Xin Yang, Wenxuan Liu, Tinghai Zhang, Jia Fu, Hongzhi Zhang, Xiangyu Wu, Ruiming Tang, Tingting Gao, Han Li
arXiv:2606.29997v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Automatic evaluation of image and video captioning is essential for benchmarking multimodal systems, although standard evaluation metrics show limi...
By Shuitsu Koyama, Kazuki Matsuda, Yuiga Wada, Shinnosuke Hirano, Daichi Yashima, Komei Sugiura
arXiv:2607. 28967v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompt tuning adapts vision--language models with few trainable parameters, but existing approaches trade off efficiency and adaptation: static textual prompts can overfit source classes, image-conditioned prompts add per-instance computation, and multimodal tuning modifies the visual branch.
By Pouya Parsa, Raoof Zare Moayedi, Seongjin Choi
arXiv:2607. 14125v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) enable zero-shot image classification by computing the similarity score between an image and textual descriptions, typically formed by inserting a class label (e.
By Ruijiang Dong, Zesheng Ye, Jianzhong Qi, Lei Feng, Feng Liu, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama
arXiv:2609.00591v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: An image may be worth a thousand words, but most captioning models describe it in only a few. Modern vision-language models produce fluent high-level c...
By Suryaansh Jain, Rahasya Barkur, Vishal G, Ryan Rossi, Franck Dernoncourt, Jack Wang, Koustava Goswami, Nedim Lipka, Puneet Mathur, Samyadeep Basu, Seunghyun Yoon
The paper investigates why long image captions often fail, arguing that failure depends not just on what facts are mentioned but also on where they appear in the caption. It introduces a position‑aware rubric that breaks down dense human references into atomic visual claims, evaluates generated captions against these claims, and identifies two distinct failure modes: unsupported specificity in the middle and vague, non‑evidential language at the end. Building on this diagnosis, the authors propose PAGER, a reinforcement‑learning objective that provides separate rewards for supported middle evidence, evidence‑bearing tail continuation, claim coverage, and length control, leading to improved position‑wise grounding and caption preference on detailed‑caption benchmarks.
arXiv:2610.41118v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language compositionality is the ability to identify which properties, relations, quantities, and states bind to which entities in both an image...
By Laure Delisle, Pietro Perona