GRACE is a step‑level benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of chain‑of‑thought reasoning over context. It provides human annotations for each step in CoT traces from 10 models across 4 datasets, labeling faithfulness, error category, and natural‑language explanations. The benchmark introduces a data‑driven taxonomy that splits errors into GRACE‑Inference (deductive) and GRACE‑Grounding (factual) tracks, each with four categories, and demonstrates that incorporating step‑level faithfulness signals can improve downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.
By Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu
The paper introduces Fact-Ablated Evaluation (FAE), a framework that iteratively removes cited evidence to test whether large language models (LLMs) adjust their fact‑checking predictions accordingly. Experiments reveal that many off‑the‑shelf LLMs rely more on internal knowledge than on the provided evidence. To address this, the authors propose REAL, a training method that uses counterfactual evidence supervision to encourage LLMs to base veracity judgments on evidence, achieving better evidence‑dependent performance across four datasets.
By Xingyu Deng, Mingzi Cao, Nikolaos Aletras, Xi Wang, Mark Stevenson
Large language models increasingly rely on long-form reasoning for complex tasks, yet their reasoning traces may drift away from the supplied context when evidence is sparse, noisy, or in conflict with parametric knowledge. Existing grounding methods either attach citations after generation or encourage evidence retrieval inside the trace, but they often do not ensure that cited content is sufficient for the local inference and final answer.
arXiv:2604. 13201v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models are emerging as scientific assistants, but evaluating their ability to reason from empirical data remains challenging.
By Oliver Bentham, Vivek Srikumar
The paper introduces LURCH, a benchmark of 6,550 question‑answering instances that quantifies long‑context reasoning difficulty using three properties: evidence scope, evidence dispersion, and reasoning depth. Experiments with both proprietary and open‑weight models show that these properties are strongly negatively correlated with performance, that performance drops sharply for dispersed evidence as context length grows, and that difficulty increases when multiple properties are high simultaneously. The study demonstrates that context length alone is insufficient to explain model failures, and that the new metrics provide a more nuanced understanding of long‑context challenges.
By Shiwen Qin, Cameron Barker, Henry Gouk, Elliot J. Crowley, Shay B. Cohen, Mirella Lapata, Miao Li
Understanding and reasoning over long contexts has become a key requirement for deploying large language models (LLMs) in realistic applications. Although recent LLMs support increasingly long context windows, they often fail to use relevant evidence that is already present in the input, revealing a gap between context access and effective context utilization.
arXiv:2610.07894v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are expected to answer questions faithfully based on the provided context, abstaining when the context information is in...
By Zizhuo Zhang, Xiong Peng, Jingwei Sun, Rong Yao, Borui Jiang, Bo Han
arXiv:2610.08388v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in question answering, yet they still frequently suffer from hallucinations on kno...
By Yang Hong, Yajun Yang, Xin Wang, Liping Jing, Qinghua Hu
arXiv:2607. 02509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding and reasoning over long contexts has become a key requirement for deploying large language models (LLMs) in realistic applications.
By Yanjun Zhao, Ruizhong Qiu, Tianxin Wei, Yuanchen Bei, Zhining Liu, Lingjie Chen, Ismini Lourentzou, Hanghang Tong, Jingrui He
CoEM introduces a Commit-on-Evidence Memory system that learns when to compress source evidence into compact memory facts while preserving potentially useful excerpts verbatim in a pending set. The system uses a learned policy to decide whether to promote, retain, or discard each pending excerpt as new context arrives, and a frozen verifier ensures only supported facts are committed. Reinforcement learning trains this policy with step-level evidence rewards and final answer rewards, leading to consistent improvements in long-context reasoning, achieving 10.4–11.4 F1 points over the strongest baseline on 6,400-document inputs.
By Jingguang Li, Yebo Wu, Zuyi Guo, Kailang Ma, Xianjie Dai, Han Zheng, Benwang Chen, Li Li, Can Rong, Heye Huang
arXiv:2607. 10562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the multi-hop reasoning capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge.
By JungMin Yun, JuneHyoung Kwon, YoungBin Kim
arXiv:2608.30426v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current dialogue systems struggle with dynamic information retrieval, often leading to hallucinations and lower response accuracy. We address this by a...
By Markel Ferro, Oier Lopez de Lacalle