The article discusses a small adversarial test set designed to detect retrieval failures in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines that typical evaluation sets might miss. It emphasizes the importance of proactively testing your own RAG system to uncover hidden weaknesses before users encounter them. By using this targeted test set, developers can improve the reliability and robustness of their RAG models.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #3] - Why the ML toolkit (hyperparameter sweeps, train/test splits, explainability frameworks) solves the wrong problem, and what to use instead The post RAG Is Not Machine Learning, and the ML Toolkit Solves the Wrong Problem appeared first on Towards Data Science .
A practical guide to building an evaluation workflow that catches retrieval failures, hallucinations, and performance drift before they reach users The post Building Trustworthy Production RAG Systems Through Continuous Evaluation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Increasing context size in RAG systems doesn’t improve accuracy for aggregation tasks—it makes errors harder to detect. In this article, I benchmark retrieval-based pipelines against a deterministic full-scan engine across 100,000 rows and show why computation queries must be routed away from RAG entirely.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #12] - The category of question most RAG pipelines silently fail on, and the pipeline shape that handles them The post Loop Engineering for Listing Questions: When the Answer Is Every Passage, Not the Top One appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article argues that Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is only one tool in NLP, and many real-world problems—such as request classification, free‑text matching, table reading, and OCR noise cleaning—are better served by simpler, cheaper techniques. It emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate method for each task and highlights the engineering challenge of knowing which technique to apply.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6a] - Why a user question deserves the same parsing as the document, and how it splits into a retrieval brief and a generation brief before either runs The post RAG Questions Need Parsing Too: Turn the User’s String Into Briefs for Retrieval and Generation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6quinquies] - Prompt engineering, then context engineering, then loop engineering.
Vector databases are a temporary bridge. Discover why the next AI infrastructure revolution relies on persistent neural state and strict latency budgets, not on vector databases.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #6c] - The decisions the parser makes on top of the user string, using the document’s profile: dispatch, activations, full schema, three approaches to deciding what fires, the audit _meta block, and a broker-corpus walkthrough The post Dispatching the Parsed RAG Question: Chunk Strategy, Model Tier, Activations, Audit appeared first on Towards Data Science .
I built four AI retrieval architectures on a laptop and benchmarked them against the same set of documents and questions. Here’s what the results taught me about the trade-offs between plain RAG, grap...
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #8bis] - Two regimes for sending retrieved candidates to the generation brick, the sufficiency signal that picks between them, and the per-question type dispatch that makes it cheap The post Loop Engineering for RAG Generation: Iterate top-k One at a Time appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #9B] - One call wires the four upgraded bricks together, run on a paper, a NIST standard, and a report with a broken TOC The post A Production RAG Pipeline in Action: Every Answer Typed and Cited appeared first on Towards Data Science .