arXiv:2607. 29389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated a strong ability to generate syntactically correct code from natural-language specifications.
arXiv:2503.18460v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modelica is a widely adopted language for simulating complex physical systems, yet effective model creation and optimization require substant...
arXiv:2511. 14967v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in generating structured diagrams from natural language descriptions, particularly Mermaid sequence diagrams for software engineering.
arXiv:2607. 24259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has explored the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate simulation model building, typically by generating executable code directly from natural language descriptions.
arXiv:2608. 03600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) become actionable in science and engineering not as isolated formulae, but as executable workflows that connect modelling assumptions, governing equations, numerical solvers, diagnostics, and decisions.
arXiv:2512. 03086v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in code translation, yet their performance deteriorates in low-resource programming domains such as Fortran and emerging frameworks like CUDA, where high-quality parallel data are scarce.
arXiv:2607. 22759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in code generation, but their capabilities to produce correct, synthesizable hardware description language (HDL) code still remain to be properly benchmarked.
arXiv:2606. 15943v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Engineering LLM-native software remains a challenging and immature field.
arXiv:2604.02382v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The scale and complexity of modern cloud infrastructure have made "Infrastructure-as-Code" (IaC) essential for managing deployments through d...
arXiv:2607. 01235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how Large Language Models (LLMs) make token-level decisions during code generation remains a major challenge for both researchers and practitioners.
The paper introduces Program Executability Prediction (PrEx), a task that asks large language models (LLMs) to determine whether a program is semantically valid or invalid and, if invalid, to identify the violated formal rule. To evaluate this, the authors create a dataset of systematically generated invalid programs derived from valid ones and test open‑source coding LLMs across different semantic formalisms, semantic shifts, and program splits (human‑written, LLM‑translated, fuzzer‑generated). Results show that LLMs rely more on pre‑training priors than on the provided semantics, performing poorly on modified semantics and with increasing program complexity.
The paper evaluates how well current Large Language Models can translate natural language goals, written by video game testers, into well‑formed PDDL targets for classical planning. Using a carefully designed prompt template, six state‑of‑the‑art LLMs were tested on correctness, speed, and error tendencies with real‑world benchmarks. All models achieved high correctness (>92%), with Gemini 2.5 Flash reaching 96% accuracy and the fewest false positives, while GPT‑4.1 was the fastest, yet differences in performance and occasional failures due to ambiguity and domain limits remain.
arXiv:2507. 22080v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Acquiring high-quality instruction-code pairs is essential for training Large Language Models for code generation.