arXiv AI

HiFi-KPI: A Dataset for Hierarchical KPI Extraction from Earnings Filings

arXiv:2502. 15411v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate tagging of earnings reports can yield significant short-term returns for stakeholders.

arXiv AI
Jul 22

Benchmarking Generalization in Financial Statement Fraud Detection: robust evaluation and novel tasks

arXiv:2607. 19259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial statement fraud detection (FSFD) is crucial for market integrity but faces challenges from increasingly sophisticated schemes and under-utilized textual data in financial reports.

By Guy Stephane Waffo Dzuyo (Forvis Mazars, LORIA CNRS Universit\'e de Lorraine), Ga\"el Guibon (LORIA CNRS Universit\'e de Lorraine, LIPN CNRS Universit\'e Sorbonne Paris Nord), Christophe Cerisara (LORIA CNRS Universit\'e de Lorraine), Luis Belmar-Letelier (Forvis Mazars)
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 22

IPO Finance Agent: Evaluation of LLM Financial Analysts beyond Finance Agent v2, with Automated Rubric Generation -- the Case of the SpaceX (SPCX) IPO

Finance Agent v2 (by Vals AI) has emerged as the reference benchmark for evaluating both Anthropic Claude and OpenAI ChatGPT frontier language models on financial tasks. However, it narrowly deals with periodic reporting from publicly traded companies (SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings), and its agentic harness relies on naive, unenriched chunk retrieval.

arXiv AI
Jun 12

Fin-RATE: A Real-world Financial Analytics and Tracking Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs on SEC Filings

arXiv:2602. 07294v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the increasing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the finance domain, LLMs are increasingly expected to parse complex regulatory disclosures.

By Yidong Jiang, Junrong Chen, Eftychia Makri, Jialin Chen, Peiwen Li, Ali Maatouk, Leandros Tassiulas, Eliot Brenner, Bing Xiang, Rex Ying
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

Diagnosing Fine-Grained Inconsistency Classification in Financial Disclosure Text

Financial disclosures contain numerical claims, temporal statements, entity references, policy commitments, and risk descriptions that may conflict in qualitatively different ways. Detecting a conflict is only the first step: review workflows may also need to determine its type, since numerical, temporal, referential, factual, and normative inconsistencies require different evidence and downstream checks.