arXiv Machine Learning

What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements

arXiv AI
2d ago

The Inference Engineering Pareto Atlas: Which Optimizations Dominate the Cost, Quality, and Latency Frontier?

The paper presents a Pareto atlas of LLM inference optimizations, mapping cost, quality, and latency trade‑offs for Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct on L4, A100, and H100 GPUs. Using 54 measured configurations and a calibrated simulator, it identifies 18 of 36 setups on the Pareto frontier, showing that combined methods outperform single ones. Quality tests reveal that AWQ 4bit and FP8 weights offer significant latency reductions while largely preserving accuracy, but naive FP8 KV caching fails to answer any questions correctly.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Does YOLO26 Truly Offer Advantages Over Its Predecessors for Edge Deployment? A Benchmark Study in Aquaculture

The paper evaluates the new YOLO26 architecture, which offers NMS-free end-to-end inference and is tailored for CPU-based edge devices, against three earlier Ultralytics models (YOLOv5u, YOLOv8, and YOLO11) in aquaculture fish mortality detection. Across nano, small, and medium scales, all models achieved similar detection accuracy on a full dataset, but differences emerged in data efficiency and deployment performance: YOLOv8 reached 90% mAP50 with only 400 images, while YOLO26 variants needed 1,000 images; YOLO26n was fastest on a Raspberry Pi 5 (7.51 FPS), whereas YOLOv5mu led on CPU-based hardware. The study concludes that architectural novelty alone does not dictate suitability for edge AI in aquaculture; training data size, target hardware, and inference needs must be jointly considered.

By Rakesh Ranjan, Gajanan S. Kothawade, Kata Sharrer, Scott Tsukuda, Christopher Good
arXiv AI
Sep 11

FP8 is All You Need (Part 1): Debunking Hardware FP64 as the HPC Holy Grail (Sep 3rd version)

The article argues that on AI‑optimised NVIDIA B300 GPUs and newer, the FP8 tensor‑core matrix operation—implemented via the CRT‑based Ozaki Scheme II—can become the primary substrate for matrix‑heavy FP64 kernels while maintaining FP64‑grade accuracy. It introduces the Tensor‑Memory Equilibrium (TME) model, a Roofline extension with four parameters, to show that FP8 can match native FP64 performance under certain intensity thresholds and tile‑fusion conditions. The study identifies two notable exceptions—large dense‑square DGEMM and 3‑D FFT—where additional hardware or software adjustments are required to reach the memory roof. whyItMatters":"The paper demonstrates that FP8, with appropriate reconstruction and deconstruction strategies, can replace native FP64 for high‑performance computing workloads on modern GPUs, potentially reducing hardware complexity and energy consumption while preserving accuracy."

By Satoshi Matsuoka