arXiv Computation and Language

HyperProve: Answer-Guided Hypergraph Expansion for Multi-Hop Question Answering

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

GTA-RAG: Graph-Trajectory-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning

arXiv:2608.22479v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables LLMs to access external knowledge for answering knowledge-intensive questions. For complex multi-hop quest...

By Jun Chen, Yongchao Liu, Pengyu Qiu, Jiajun Zheng, Juelu Zhang, Yujie Zeng, Qin Zhang, Ziyue Qiao, Xiao Luo
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

PRISM: Agentic Retrieval with LLMs for Multi-Hop Question Answering

PRISM is an agentic retrieval framework that uses large language models in a structured loop to improve evidence gathering for multi‑hop question answering. It splits retrieval into three specialized agents—a Question Analyzer, a Selector focused on precision, and an Adder focused on recall—whose iterative interaction yields a compact yet comprehensive evidence set. Experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue, and MultiHopRAG show that PRISM consistently outperforms strong baselines by achieving higher retrieval accuracy and filtering out distracting content.

By Md Mahadi Hasan Nahid, Davood Rafiei
arXiv AI
3d ago

Diagnosing the Fact-Grounding Gap in Multi-Hop Question Answering

The paper investigates multi‑hop question answering systems and identifies two distinct failure modes: retrieval failures, where the necessary passage is not retrieved, and extraction failures, where the passage is retrieved but the required fact cannot be extracted—a phenomenon termed the fact‑grounding gap. Across three standard benchmarks, extraction failures account for nearly half of all per‑hop deficiencies and are invisible to standard retrieval metrics, remaining unresolved by retrieval‑only interventions. The study shows that these two bottlenecks require different solutions, a distinction currently missing from evaluation practices.

By Kevin Mo, Nathan Mo, Richard Zhu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Hi-Q: Hierarchical Evidence-guided Query Refinement for Multi-Hop Question Answering

Hi-Q is a new framework for multi‑hop question answering that refines queries hierarchically based on evidence retrieved from a corpus. At each node it tests whether the current query unit is supported by evidence; if not, the node is expanded using a dependency‑preserving binary operator and verified for semantic coverage. The resulting query tree grows according to corpus support signals, and Hi‑Q achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on three multi‑hop QA benchmarks, outperforming both iterative retrieval and graph‑based baselines without constructing a corpus‑wide graph.

By Jueun Kim, Sungho Park, Wook-Shin Han
arXiv AI
Aug 20

DeepWeaver: Bridging the Evidence Synthesis Gap in Open-Ended Question Answering

DeepWeaver is a framework designed to improve open‑ended question answering by weaving noisy retrieved evidence into comprehensive, well‑cited answers. It introduces Thought Block Chains (TBCs) that organize claims, key information, and supporting evidence, and uses subordinate TBCs to refine and expand the evidence before final generation. Evaluations on LoQA and DeepResearch Bench show that DeepWeaver enhances content sufficiency, citation grounding, and detail preservation across multiple LLMs.

By Xujia Wang, Yizhe Zhang, Bin Xu, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

SelfGraphRAG: Bridging the Supervision Gap in Graph-Based RAG with Synthetic QA Generation

SelfGraphRAG is a framework that generates synthetic question‑answer pairs directly from the structure of a knowledge graph to train a query‑conditioned graph retriever. By capturing multi‑hop paths and local neighborhoods, the generated questions provide relational supervision without requiring manually labeled data. Experiments on multi‑hop question answering and classification tasks show that SelfGraphRAG improves retrieval precision and downstream reasoning performance compared to embedding‑based baselines.

By Ben Lagnese, Manas Gaur