UpSafe°C is a unified framework that enhances large language model safety by upcycling safety‑critical layers into a sparse Mixture‑of‑Experts structure, with a router acting as a soft guardrail. It employs a two‑stage supervised fine‑tuning strategy to improve safety discrimination while preserving general capabilities, and introduces a safety temperature mechanism for dynamic inference‑time control of the safety‑utility trade‑off. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and model scales show robust safety improvements against harmful and jailbreak inputs while maintaining competitive general performance.
By Yuhao Sun, Zhuoer Xu, Shiwen Cui, Kun Yang, Lingyun Yu, Yongdong Zhang, Hongtao Xie
Safin-1.5 is a large language model that incorporates a safety‑native architecture and a recursive safety improvement loop to enhance its own safety while maintaining utility. The architecture uses persistent safety states and hazardous‑knowledge disentanglement to isolate and remove risky knowledge with minimal impact on general capabilities. An inference‑time harness extends the model’s abilities to formal reasoning by combining language understanding with symbolic inference and verification, enabling the construction of checkable proofs.
By Jingnan Zheng, Cheng Jin, Ming Zhang, Huan Sun, Zhongtian Ma, Kaisen Yang, Ziyuan Zhou, Tong Wu, Dongcheng Zhang, Yi Zhang, Xiao Wang, Han Qi, Shu Yu, Ermo Hua, Zongji Yu, Chaozhuo Li, Xiaoyu Wen, Zhekai Chen, Jiawei Zhou, Sirui Chen, Ning Ding, An Zhang, Tat-Seng Chua, Xiangnan He, Xia Hu, Bowen Zhou, Qiaosheng Zhang, Youbang Sun, Xiang Wang, Zhongyu Huang, Chaochao Lu
arXiv:2607. 16242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-Tuning-as-a-Service (FTaaS) platforms let users train large language models (LLMs) on customized tasks, but this pipeline could erode models' safety alignment.
By Changyue Li, Jiaming He, Youliang Yuan, Jialin Wu, Boxi Yu, Zhicong Huang, Pinjia He
arXiv:2607. 16247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have empowered embodied agents to execute complex household tasks, they struggle to proactively handle dynamically emerging hazards during closed-loop interactions.
By Bingrui Sima, Lizhong Wang, Xiaoya Lu, Kun He, Xiao Yang
arXiv:2608. 09885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The safety of large language model (LLM) agents depends not only on model weights but also on the agent harness that manages context, memory, tools, permissions, and runtime control.
By Wanying Qu, Qinghua Mao, Yu Li, Jiyao Liu, Xin Zhang, Dadi Guo, Yanxu Zhu, Qingyu Liu, Leitao Yuan, Xi Lin, Shanfeng Zhu, Yanwei Fu, Jing Shao, Xia Hu, Dongrui Liu
arXiv:2607. 11475v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety alignment in large language models can be fragile under fine-tuning, as even benign task adaptation may increase harmful compliance.
By Aznaur Aliev, Carlos Hinojosa, Abdelrahman Eldesokey, Bang An, Bernard Ghanem, Yibo Yang
Safety alignment in large language models can be fragile under fine-tuning, as even benign task adaptation may increase harmful compliance. Existing defenses mainly follow two directions: they either intervene during or after fine-tuning through retraining or weight modification, which can be costly and may hurt task performance, or they use model-agnostic safety classifiers, which may miss failures specific to a given fine-tuned checkpoint.
The article surveys safety concerns for self‑evolving agents that continually update their internal state, such as model parameters and memories, from new interactions. It introduces the SAVER framework, which tracks reusable influence, adaptation, violations, exposure, and response to assess whether safety properties persist as agents evolve. The survey finds that legitimate state can become unsafe when its persistence, authority, or scope expands beyond its original conditions, and highlights gaps in current research on descendant repair and longitudinal evaluation.
By Jiahao Chen, Zhou Feng, Oubo Ma, Yichen Yan, Ruixiao Lin, Hangtao Zhang, Linkang Du, Hengyu An, Yong Yang, Jun Liu, Junhao Li, Naen Xu, Chunyi Zhou, Yuan Su, Zehao Jin, Qianli Ma, Leyi Qi, Yiming Wang, Zhe Ma, Yuwen Pu, Mengyao Du, Yuanyi Song, Enhao Huang, Zhihui Fu, Jun Wang, Jinfeng Li, Yuefeng Chen, Hui Xue, Yiming Li, Tianyu Du, Shouling Ji
arXiv:2606. 06519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-weight LLMs are increasingly fine-tuned into customized assistants, but downstream fine-tuning can weaken safety alignment and make models more vulnerable to malicious prompts, even when the training data is not intentionally harmful.
By Yanghan Wang, Zhiqiang Kou, Fu Feng, Jing Wang, Xin Geng
arXiv:2606. 00686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The prevailing paradigm in large language model (LLM) alignment operates via erasure, filtering unsafe data or training models to strictly refuse harmful prompts.
By Maryam Hashemzadeh, Jerry Huang, Minseon Kim, Marc-Alexandre C\^ot\'e, Sarath Chandar
arXiv:2608. 19652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As LLM-based agents are deployed for longer and higher-stakes tasks, their memory systems continue to have crucial gaps.
By Xinyi Fan, Miri Liu, Ruozhen Yang, Siru Ouyang, Jiawei Han
arXiv:2608. 03137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents must retain reusable information, control a bounded active context, and recover earlier evidence during long-horizon interaction.
By Xiaolong Sun, Qichao Wang, Hangyu Li, Liang Chen