An agentic framework called GW‑Eyes, powered by large language models, is introduced to autonomously associate gravitational‑wave (GW) signals with candidate electromagnetic (EM) counterparts. It integrates domain‑specific tools for tasks such as catalog management, skymap visualization, and rapid verification, while enabling natural‑language interaction to assist human experts. The framework leverages LLMs’ decision‑making and traceable reasoning to address the growing data‑analysis challenges of next‑generation GW and EM detectors.
arXiv:2605.11280v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fast surrogate models for expensive simulations are now essential across the sciences, yet they typically operate as black boxes. We present...
arXiv:2605.11269v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern gravitational wave astronomy relies on modeling tasks that often require months of graduate-level effort, including building fast wave...
arXiv:2512. 02968v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gravitational-wave data analysis relies on accurate and efficient methods to extract physical information from noisy detector signals, yet the increasing rate and complexity of observations represent a growing challenge.
arXiv:2605. 14791v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) agents are pushing AI beyond tools toward autonomous scientific discovery.
arXiv:2609.24246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in natural language understanding, yet their effectiveness in specialized fields like astro...
arXiv:2601. 14288v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present DeepInflation, an AI agent designed for research and model discovery in inflationary cosmology.
arXiv:2607. 01372v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gravitational Waves (GWs) represent the newest window of astronomy, furthering our understanding of compact objects like black holes and neutron stars in the Universe.
arXiv:2606. 00384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fitting quantitative models to data is a central step in scientific workflows, yet it remains one of the least automated.
arXiv:2609.07102v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Astronomical spectra encode rich physical information, but drawing scientific conclusions from spectral features typically requires expert interpreta...
arXiv:2604. 12306v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Climate decision-making in the GCC states increasingly demands systems that can translate heterogeneous scientific and policy evidence into actionable guidance, yet general-purpose large language models (LLMs) remain weak both in region-specific climate knowledge and grounded interaction with geospatial and forecasting tools.
arXiv:2607. 29561v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Symbolic Regression (SR) aims to discover analytical equations from observational data and plays a central role in scientific modeling.
The paper investigates whether domain-specific fine‑tuning benefits open‑ended scientific reasoning in astronomy. Using a curated 300‑question QA benchmark from 2017–2026 Olympiad‑style materials, the authors compare open‑weight, API‑served general‑purpose, multimodal, and astronomy‑specialized language models. Results show that strong general‑purpose models set the highest correctness baseline, but variations in metric agreement, judge sensitivity, benchmark composition, and modality suggest that domain specialization is task‑ and deployment‑dependent and that domain‑specific evaluation is crucial for scientific workflows.