arXiv AI By Wenke Ren, Hengxiao Guo, Wenwen Zuo, Xiaoman Zhang

A systematic evaluation of vision-language models for observational astronomical reasoning tasks

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces AstroVLBench, a benchmark of 4,100 expert‑verified instances covering optical imaging, radio interferometry, multi‑wavelength photometry, time‑domain light curves, and optical spectroscopy. Six leading vision‑language models were evaluated, revealing that performance varies strongly with modality and is not predicted by general benchmark rankings. Mechanistic ablations identified three bottlenecks: prompt grounding depends on model and task, presenting one‑dimensional data as tables rather than plots improves light‑curve classification, and a significant fraction of correct predictions are supported by physically inconsistent reasoning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 17

Rethinking Domain Specialization for Open-Ended Scientific Reasoning in Astronomy Language Models

The paper investigates whether domain-specific fine‑tuning benefits open‑ended scientific reasoning in astronomy. Using a curated 300‑question QA benchmark from 2017–2026 Olympiad‑style materials, the authors compare open‑weight, API‑served general‑purpose, multimodal, and astronomy‑specialized language models. Results show that strong general‑purpose models set the highest correctness baseline, but variations in metric agreement, judge sensitivity, benchmark composition, and modality suggest that domain specialization is task‑ and deployment‑dependent and that domain‑specific evaluation is crucial for scientific workflows.

By Vanessa Lama, Sanjay Das, Emily Herron, Yuan-Sen Ting, Tijmen de Haan, Junqi Yin, Tirthankar Ghosal, Feiyi Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 14

How Do VLMs Behave When Blind or Misled? Behavioral Evaluation of VLMs on Scientific Figures

arXiv:2608. 13267v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing vision-language model (VLM) benchmarks emphasize perception and reasoning accuracy (how well VLMs describe and reason about what they see in an image), with limited attention to behavioral reliability under uncertainty (how they behave when visual evidence is missing or misleading).

By Paul Osemudiame Oamen, Owusu-Banahene Osei, Ananya Mukherjee, Christian Greisinger, Steffen Eger, Pius Onobhayedo, Wei Zhao
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

SciFigBench: A Benchmark for Scientific Method Figure Understanding

SciFigBench is a new benchmark for evaluating Vision Language Models on scientific method figure understanding. It focuses on three fine‑grained capabilities—dense content perception, visual relation comprehension, and information‑flow tracing—using 4,352 curated figures and 40,670 QA pairs. The authors also introduce SciFigCue, a training‑free visual prompting module that improves performance on several tasks without updating model parameters.

By Lijia Wu, Zheng Li, Yuxuan Liu, Jingwen Zhang, Penghai Zhao, Xiang Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Leveraging Multimodality for Real-Time Classification of Transients and Variables found by the Zwicky Transient Facility

arXiv:2607. 00228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern time-domain surveys such as the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) generate hundreds of thousands of alerts each night, making real-time decisions for follow-up observations a central challenge in time-domain astronomy.

By Ved G. Shah, Nabeel Rehemtulla, Adam A. Miller, Sushant Sharma Chaudhary, Michael W. Coughlin, Antoine Le Calloch, Matthew J. Graham, Joahan Castaneda Jaimes, Theophile Jegou du Laz, Ashish A. Mahabal, Frank J. Masci, Josiah Purdum, Reed Riddle, Jesper Sollerman, Anastasia Wei, Mansi M. Kasliwal