Hugging Face Trending Papers

Explainable-by-Design Audio Deepfake Detection via Wiener-Hopf Linear Prediction

The rapid advancement of synthetic speech generation methods has made audio deepfake detection a critical challenge in multimedia forensics. While recent approaches achieve high detection accuracy, they typically rely on black-box architectures that offer limited interpretability and high computational complexity.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

MADBench: A Benchmark for Modality-Aware Audio Deepfake Detection

arXiv:2608. 09593v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in speech synthesis and audio generation have made high-fidelity acoustic forgery low-cost and difficult to attribute, enabling a realistic attack scenario in which speech and background audio are independently manipulated over otherwise authentic video.

By Yanqiu Li, Yang Xiao, Jisheng Bai, Bin Chen, Hong Jia, Ting Dang
arXiv AI
Jun 10

What Do Deepfake Speech Detectors Actually Hear?

arXiv:2606. 10912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake speech detectors often output a single score without explaining why an audio sample is flagged, where in the signal the evidence lies, or what cues drive the decision.

By Vojt\v{e}ch Stan\v{e}k, Veronika Jirmusov\'a, Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Jakub Re\v{s}, Martin Pere\v{s}\'ini
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Teffic-Audio: Tell Fact from Fiction

arXiv:2607. 28351v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech deepfake detection has expanded in scope with increasingly heterogeneous spoofing mechanisms, including speech synthesis, voice conversion, vocoder reconstruction, and neural-codec resynthesis.

By Wan Lin, Li Wang, Jindong Wang, Kunyu Feng, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv AI
Sep 4

ToolDF: Tool-Integrated Reasoning for Mixed-Authenticity Audio Deepfake Detection

ToolDF is a tool‑integrated reasoning framework designed for detecting mixed‑authenticity audio deepfakes, where genuine and manipulated audio cues coexist across time or overlapping sources. It uses an audio large language model to orchestrate tasks such as source separation and routing to domain‑specific experts, aggregating their evidence into an interpretable verdict. The authors also introduce a mixed‑authenticity ADD benchmark and report that ToolDF outperforms monolithic baselines, achieving significant macro‑F1 gains while localizing evidence to specific temporal regions and acoustic sources.

By Taewoo Kim, Young Han Lee, Nam In Park, Chanwoo Kim