arXiv AI

Neurosymbolics for Data Engineering: Achieving Long Context Token Reduction Without Finetuning

Neurosymbolics for Data Engineering introduces a neurosymbolic layer that can be added to existing LLM backbones to improve logical reasoning and reduce long‑context token usage. The layer boosts accuracy by an average of 85% on benchmarks such as BIRD‑CRITIC and LiveSQLBench without any task‑specific finetuning or RLHF. It also cuts effective token usage by over 50% and lowers time complexity from O(n²) to roughly O(n) for long‑context tasks.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Beyond Quacking: Deep Integration of Language Models and RAG into DuckDB

The paper introduces FlockMTL, an extension for database management systems that deeply integrates large language models and retrieval‑augmented generation into DuckDB. It provides model‑driven scalar and aggregate functions, cost‑based optimizations like batching and caching, and new SQL DDL abstractions (PROMPT and MODEL) to treat LLMs as first‑class schema objects. These features aim to simplify the development of knowledge‑intensive analytical applications by reducing the effort required to orchestrate heterogeneous data systems and manage LLM context.

By Anas Dorbani, Sunny Yasser, Jimmy Lin, Amine Mhedhbi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

Understanding Axes of Difficulty For Long Context Tasks Via PredicateLongBench

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated rapidly improving long-context capabilities, prompting a wave of benchmarks designed to evaluate them. However, existing long-context evaluations - from Needle-in-a-Haystack (NIAH) tests to more recent multi-hop reasoning and summarization tasks - predominantly measure average-case performance, and many are either saturated or lack robustness.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

The paper surveys efficient reasoning in large language models, contrasting fast intuitive (System 1) and slow deep (System 2) reasoning. It analyzes why System 2 is computationally costly yet more accurate, and why System 1 is efficient but less effective. The survey covers causes of inefficiency, patterns of reasoning behavior, and potential solutions to balance performance and computational budgets, offering actionable insights and an open‑source repository for ongoing research.

By Rui Wang, Hongru Wang, Boyang Xue, Jianhui Pang, Shudong Liu, Yi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Derek Fai Wong, Heng Ji, Kam-Fai Wong