arXiv Machine Learning

Harnessing Large Language Models to Compile Task-Relevant Context into Bayesian Optimisation

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

Understanding Axes of Difficulty For Long Context Tasks Via PredicateLongBench

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated rapidly improving long-context capabilities, prompting a wave of benchmarks designed to evaluate them. However, existing long-context evaluations - from Needle-in-a-Haystack (NIAH) tests to more recent multi-hop reasoning and summarization tasks - predominantly measure average-case performance, and many are either saturated or lack robustness.

arXiv AI
Aug 13

Behavior and Representation in Open-Weight Large Language Models for Combinatorial Optimization: From Feature Extraction to Algorithm Selection

arXiv:2512. 13374v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) open new perspectives for automation in optimization, yet little is known about whether their internal representations capture problem structure or algorithmic behavior.

By Francesca Da Ros, Luca Di Gaspero, Kevin Roitero
arXiv AI
Jul 8

LongCrafter: Towards Diverse Long-Context Understanding via Evidence-Graph-Guided Instruction Synthesis

arXiv:2607. 06160v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthesizing long-context supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data is a scalable way to enhance the long-context understanding of large language models (LLMs), yet existing approaches share three limitations: narrow task coverage, insufficient instruction difficulty, and a lack of faithfulness supervision.

By Chenhao Yuan, Yinhao Xu, Shuwen Xu, Xizhi Yang, Jiaxiang Liu, Chenxi Zhou, Shaoping Huang, Haolin Ren, Pengfei Cao, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

LongHarness Bench: Stress-Testing Language Model Harnesses for Long-Context Reasoning

The paper introduces LongHarness Bench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate both the effectiveness and efficiency of language model harnesses for long-context reasoning. It features tasks that require diverse retrieval strategies—such as lexical search and semantic matching—and strategic, adaptive reasoning over global and local context, with only a small subset of the context being useful at each step. Evaluations across multiple state‑of‑the‑art models and harnesses show that even strong combinations achieve only 68% macro‑average accuracy, and that the same model can vary markedly in efficiency depending on the harness used.

By Quang Hieu Pham, Thuy Duong Nguyen, Jocelyn Qiaochu Chen, Xi Ye