The paper introduces SAC‑Bench, a benchmark of 616,031 audio clips that test audio‑language models (ALMs) on how they handle conflicts between spoken claims and acoustic evidence. It covers 188 sound‑event classes across seven semantic, temporal, and spatial tasks, pairing environmental recordings with either compatible or contradictory synthesized spoken claims and including audio‑only controls. Evaluation of five open‑weight ALMs shows that high audio‑only accuracy often coexists with significant drops in performance under conflicting claims, revealing gaps in conflict robustness and the mixed effects of prompt interventions.
arXiv:2609.23416v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-form audio performance is often summarized by context length and aggregate accuracy, obscuring how language, evidence, and task jointly shape di...
arXiv:2608.27783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech language models (speech LLMs) can generate plausible outputs from audio that contains no usable speech evidence. We study this failure...
The paper introduces ContraTalk, a benchmark that tests whether dialogue models truly use acoustic cues or rely on transcript shortcuts. It formalizes cross‑modal disagreement, creates conflict and consistent QA examples, and proposes an Audio Twin representation to expose acoustic evidence to models. Experiments show that while text‑only LLMs perform well on consistent cases, they falter on conflict cases, and AudioLLMs only partially mitigate this issue.
arXiv:2608.22236v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) have shown promising progress in understanding speech, music, and general sound events, yet their ability...
arXiv:2609.38232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Streaming spoken agents may take an external action before the available speech supports it, yet final-turn scores do not reveal whether each observe...
arXiv:2609.33212v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Speaker verification systems achieve high accuracy but provide little account of the acoustic evidence behind their judgments. Making these systems...
arXiv:2608. 19515v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prosodic cues can convey task-relevant information that alters the trajectory and outcome of a task-oriented dialogue, even when the words themselves remain unchanged.
arXiv:2607. 21820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors are trained to distinguish genuine speech from synthetic speech and often perform well on standard benchmarks.
The paper introduces STAG, a post‑hoc framework that provides token‑level spectro‑temporal grounding for captions produced by audio‑based multimodal large language models (MLLMs). STAG estimates temporal support for each token via vocabulary projections of encoded audio, measures frequency‑band relevance through controlled spectral occlusion, and fuses these signals into a spectro‑temporal relevance map. Evaluations across ten explanation methods and four grounding benchmarks show that STAG achieves superior event‑localization performance on every dataset, and counterfactual deletion experiments confirm that removing the identified evidence selectively reduces model confidence and often eliminates the corresponding event from regenerated captions.
The paper introduces VeriSpeak, a benchmark of 3,879 spoken claims for evaluating fact verification in Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). It shows a clear modality gap: models that verify written claims well often fail on spoken versions, and retrieval alone offers limited improvement. Combining retrieval with explicit reasoning yields the best performance, reaching 86.1% accuracy and demonstrating the need for grounded reasoning over retrieved evidence in speech misinformation detection.
Prosodic cues can convey task-relevant information that alters the trajectory and outcome of a task-oriented dialogue, even when the words themselves remain unchanged. Yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate prosodic perception, response appropriateness, and task-oriented dialogue in isolation, making it difficult to test whether prosodic evidence changes downstream decisions.
arXiv:2606. 11219v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for speech-based understanding, yet their ability to perform semantic reasoning beyond transcription, Text-to-Audio Retrieval, Captioning, and Question-Answering accuracy remains insufficiently benchmarked.