arXiv:2508. 21571v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a very popular class of neural solvers for partial differential equations.
By Bangti Jin, Longjun Wu
arXiv:2607. 19167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Motivated by the numerical computation of the Mean Escape Time (MET) $\tau:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}$ of a stochastic process from a bounded domain $\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d$, we study elliptic Dirichlet boundary value problems (BVPs) using boundary-enforced Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), in which the Dirichlet condition is imposed exactly by multiplying the network output with a predefined distance-to-boundary approximation $\rho$.
By Nathanael Tepakbong, Jun Fan, Xiang Zhou, Ding-Xuan Zhou
arXiv:2608. 09494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper we provide Monte Carlo and deep neural network approximations for stochastic representations of solutions to linear elliptic partial differential equations with constant diffusion, drift and killing.
By Konrad Kleinberg, Thomas Kruse
arXiv:2607. 24726v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Deep Galerkin Method (DGM) and Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have become widely-used methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in the rapidly growing field of scientific machine learning.
By Justin Sirignano, Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, Samuel Cohen
arXiv:2606. 24999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) with unknown coefficients arise widely in scientific machine learning, including continuous-time reinforcement learning, yet solving them efficiently in a data-driven way remains challenging.
By Yanwei Jia, Du Ouyang, Huy\^en Pham, Xun Yu Zhou
arXiv:2607. 02003v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although neural networks are remarkably effective, their underlying optimization principles remain theoretically elusive, often characterized by non-convex landscapes and stochastic heuristics.
By Matej Benko, Pierre Bousquet, Iwona Chlebicka, B{\l}a\.zej Miasojedow
arXiv:2406. 14340v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method, as well as adaptive methods such as the Adam optimizer fail to converge if the learning rates do not converge to zero (particularly, in the situation of constant learning rates).
By Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert
arXiv:2606. 00643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often train slowly or fail to converge on challenging partial differential equations (PDEs), a behavior recently linked to severely ill-conditioned loss landscapes inherited from the underlying differential operator.
By Nathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu Hu, Chengyu Liu, Xiang Zhou
arXiv:2605. 08170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as a powerful tool for learning mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces.
By Nicole Hao
arXiv:2606. 31342v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Partial differential equations on unbounded domains are challenging because the exterior region must be represented without excessive truncation error.
By Haixin Wang, Haoning Dang, Fei Wang, Shimin Guo
arXiv:2607. 20378v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed learning of partial differential equations (PDEs) has been dominated by multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), whose spectral bias and dense parameterization limit both accuracy and interpretability.
By Amirhossein Sadr, Nima Soltani, Vahideh Moghtadaiee, Aida Pakniyat, Dara Rahmati, Saeid Gorgin
arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
By Joseph Webb, Sadok Jerad, Coralia Cartis