Natural language processing

Classical and neural NLP: translation, question answering, tokenization and the evaluation of language understanding.

2,601 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Sep 2

EDRAC: Benchmarking Arabic Dialect Reading Comprehension

EDRAC is the first large‑scale benchmark for dialectal Arabic machine reading comprehension and generative question answering, covering five major dialects—Egyptian, Moroccan, Emirati, Syrian, and Saudi. It contains 499 passages from naturally spoken interactions and 4,977 QA pairs produced via a human–LLM collaborative pipeline. The benchmark evaluates Arabic‑centric and multilingual large language models, revealing gaps between semantic answer quality and dialectal fidelity and underscoring limitations of current evaluation metrics for dialectal Arabic generation.

By Noor Abo Mokh, Kirill Chirkunov, Teresa Lynn, Nizar Habash, Reham Marzouk, Malik H. Altakrori, Younes Samih, Muhammed Abu Odeh, Nour Rabih, Rahaf Alshahrani, Hamad Alshehhi, Hamdan Al-Ali, Muhra Almahri, Besher Hassan, Mohamed Anwar, Abed Alhakim Freihat, Preslav Nakov, Alham Fikri Aji
arXiv AI
Sep 2

LatentPress: Context Compression Beyond Text and Vision

LatentPress compresses conversational histories and long documents into continuous memory tokens that a frozen decoder can read directly, eliminating the need for text reconstruction at inference. The method achieves 4–16× compression with only a small adapter (0.1% of the decoder’s parameters) and outperforms text summaries and OCR-based compression on LongMemEval and LongBench-QA benchmarks. Writing and reading are significantly faster than traditional text summarization or OCR reconstruction, demonstrating a practical machine-facing context interface beyond text and vision.

By Zhengze Zhou, Hejian Sang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation

The paper introduces a semantic correctness taxonomy that categorizes open‑ended QA answers into eight ordered classes, distinguishing between correct, verbose, and hallucinated responses. It releases two datasets—CAP‑Correctness and CAP‑Statements—to support benchmark evaluation and NLI‑based training. The authors also propose CAP (Context‑Aware Precision), a reference‑based metric that scores question‑conditioned statements via bidirectional NLI and demonstrates superior performance under a monotonicity protocol.

By Elitsa Yotkova, Violeta Kastreva, Petar Velkov, Hristo Boyanov, Dimitar Dimitrov, Ivan Koychev, Preslav Nakov
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2

Qwen-Drive-1.0: An Initial Step towards a Vision-Language Foundation Model for Autonomous Driving

Qwen-Drive-1.0 is a vision‑language foundation model tailored for autonomous driving that builds on a pretrained VLM architecture. It incorporates a bird’s‑eye‑view perception head for 3D object detection, semantic occupancy prediction, and BEV map segmentation, and a Planning Expert that generates future ego trajectories from shared representations. Experiments show strong 3D perception, driving scene understanding, and competitive motion‑planning performance while largely preserving general vision‑language capabilities.

By Xin Zhou, Zongchuang Zhao, Zhibo Yang, Mingsheng Li, Humen Zhong, Shuai Bai, Du Chu, Ruizhe Chen, Zhaohai Li, Jun Tang, Qiuyue Wang, Mingkun Yang, Jiazhao Zhang, Dayiheng Liu, Dingkang Liang, Xiang Bai
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Visual Attention Faithfulness in Vision-Language Models is Heterogeneous

The study investigates whether attention weights in Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) accurately reflect model reasoning for visual inputs. Using causal perturbation analysis, it identifies three distinct processing modes—Faithful‑Sufficient, Faithful‑Distributed, and Non‑Focal—indicating heterogeneous visual attention faithfulness. The research also shows that human‑annotated ground‑truth regions align with model attention in only about 60% of cases, highlighting a systematic divergence between model visual reliance and human intuition across VQA, document, and chart tasks.

By Xurui Song, Weishi Wang, Zhongqi Yue, Kuluhan Binici, Tao Bai, Hongxin Shao, Daniel Dahlmeier, Jun Luo
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Multilingual Medical Reasoning for Question Answering with Large Language Models

The paper introduces a method for generating multilingual reasoning traces for medical question answering using large language models. It creates 500,000 reasoning traces in English, Italian, and Spanish by retrieving medical information from Wikipedia and applies them to MedQA and MedMCQA datasets extended into Italian and Spanish. The approach improves performance in both few‑shot in‑context learning and supervised fine‑tuning, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results for 8B‑parameter LLMs and releasing all resources for further research.

By Pietro Ferrazzi, Aitor Soroa, Rodrigo Agerri
arXiv AI
Sep 2

From Terminology to Diagrams: Visual-Instruction Generation for Scientific Diagram Understanding

The paper introduces SciGram, a large-scale dataset of 194K scientific diagrams paired with 1.4M visual instructions generated through a terminology‑grounded pipeline that extracts domain concepts, synthesizes facts, and retrieves relevant diagrams. Models fine‑tuned on SciGram show significant gains on diagram‑centric benchmarks such as TQA, ScienceQA, and AI2D, and when combined with existing models like LLaVA OneVision, set new state‑of‑the‑art performance. The authors release both the dataset and trained models to support further research in scientific diagram understanding.

By Raul Ortega, Jos\'e Manuel G\'omez-P\'erez
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

DiscoTrace: Representing and Comparing Answering Strategies of Humans and LLMs in Information-Seeking Question Answering

DiscoTrace is a method that identifies rhetorical strategies used by answerers to information‑seeking questions by representing answers as sequences of question‑related discourse acts paired with interpretations of the original question, annotated on top of rhetorical structure theory parses. When applied to answers from nine different communities, DiscoTrace reveals that these communities exhibit diverse preferences for answer construction, whereas large language models (LLMs) lack such rhetorical diversity even when prompted to follow specific community guidelines. Additionally, LLMs tend to adopt a breadth‑oriented approach, addressing interpretations of questions that human answerers often ignore, highlighting a systematic difference in how LLMs and humans respond to information needs.

By Neha Srikanth, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Rachel Rudinger
arXiv AI
Sep 2

KGFR: A Foundation Retriever for Generalized Knowledge Graph Question Answering

KGFR introduces a Knowledge Graph Foundation Retriever that collaborates with large language models to enhance knowledge‑intensive question answering. By encoding relations with LLM‑generated descriptions and initializing entities from question roles, KGFR enables zero‑shot generalization to unseen knowledge graphs. Its Asymmetric Progressive Propagation technique efficiently handles large graphs, while a controllable reasoning loop allows the LLM to request candidate answers, supporting facts, and reasoning paths.

By Yuanning Cui, Zequn Sun, Wei Hu, Zhangjie Fu