arXiv:2606. 11712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: User-side memory in LLMs is typically scored as a single "personalization" capability: given a user's history, is the output more user-aware?
By Youwang Deng
arXiv:2608. 12522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based program evolution systems such as FunSearch and AlphaEvolve have shown strong ability to discover novel algorithms, but typically optimize each task in isolation, discarding search experience after completion.
By Aofan Liu, Shiyuan Song, Yiyan Qi
Fortunate Recall (FR) introduces an ontology-driven policy layer that categorizes personal facts into over ten behavioral types and applies tailored lifecycle rules—such as differential decay, supersession, and event-time validity—to manage memory persistence in large language models. The FR-Bank implementation, independent of underlying infrastructure, achieves a 76.9% pass rate on the new LifecycleBench benchmark and improves LongMemEval-S performance, while significantly reducing confabulation rates compared to prior systems. Ablation studies show that the generic lifecycle metadata drives correctness, whereas the behavioral ontology enhances calibration and reduces downstream hallucinations.
By Ansuman Mullick, Eray T\"uz\"un
arXiv:2606. 00382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential fine-tuning of large language models forces a choice: let the shared substrate keep learning and accept catastrophic forgetting, or freeze it after task one and foreclose cross-task refinement.
By Kiran Nayudu, Aswini Nutakki, Sai Vinay Naidu, Ashwin Shanmugasundaram
arXiv:2608. 12365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For fifty years, data systems have answered two questions.
By Ganesh S
Current LLM memory systems treat all personal facts identically, so stores grow without bound while retrieval precision degrades. The core challenge is lifecycle management: which memories should pers...