arXiv:2606. 11712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: User-side memory in LLMs is typically scored as a single "personalization" capability: given a user's history, is the output more user-aware?
By Youwang Deng
arXiv:2608. 12522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based program evolution systems such as FunSearch and AlphaEvolve have shown strong ability to discover novel algorithms, but typically optimize each task in isolation, discarding search experience after completion.
By Aofan Liu, Shiyuan Song, Yiyan Qi
arXiv:2606. 00382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential fine-tuning of large language models forces a choice: let the shared substrate keep learning and accept catastrophic forgetting, or freeze it after task one and foreclose cross-task refinement.
By Kiran Nayudu, Aswini Nutakki, Sai Vinay Naidu, Ashwin Shanmugasundaram
arXiv:2608. 12365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For fifty years, data systems have answered two questions.
By Ganesh S
arXiv:2608. 13883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most agent-memory benchmarks test post-hoc recall, whereas MemoryArena evaluates whether memory supports interdependent, multi-session task completion.
By Chaoqun Zhan, Qiang Zhou, Guannan Li, Zhenqiang Huang, Qianjin Wang
arXiv:2607. 20458v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents operating over extended dialogues accumulate vast amounts of information, yet existing memory systems either retain everything indiscriminately or apply uniform forgetting heuristics that fail to distinguish relevant from irrelevant knowledge.
By Haowen Lai