The paper investigates how the wording of schema‑key tokens can serve as an implicit instruction channel in constrained decoding for structured generation. By treating structured generation as a multi‑channel instruction problem, the authors analyze when an instructional advantage is preserved after grammar projection and conduct experiments on GSM8K and Math500 across seven language models. Results show that changing only the schema‑key wording can significantly alter accuracy, with both positive and negative effects, and that prompt‑level and schema‑level instructions interact non‑additively.
By Yifan Le
arXiv:2606. 05970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used for structured extraction from clinical free-text notes, but the sensitivity of their output to upstream configuration choices is less understood than their accuracy on fixed benchmarks.
By Martin Murin
Practitioners make three prompt-design decisions with almost no controlled evidence behind them: how to format instructions and context (markdown, plain text, prose, or tabular), how many simultaneous instructions a system prompt can carry before compliance degrades, and how much context a model can hold before recall and honesty degrade. We report two controlled experiments crossing all three factors on one held, contamination-free synthetic corpus (the "Book of Veyra," 8,780 uniquely-named entities, deterministically regenerable from a fixed seed), evaluated across five models.
arXiv:2607. 19257v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Practitioners make three prompt-design decisions with almost no controlled evidence behind them: how to format instructions and context (markdown, plain text, prose, or tabular), how many simultaneous instructions a system prompt can carry before compliance degrades, and how much context a model can hold before recall and honesty degrade.
By Netanel Eliav
arXiv:2608.27831v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Coding agents are now commonly evaluated on the SWE-bench family of benchmarks, whose tasks are built from curated GitHub issues--long, structured, a...
By Gyuhyeong Kim, Hyojung Gwon, Jeonghyeon Kim, Kyuhong Shim, Sunjae Lee
The study investigates how deictic ambiguity—specifically the shifting reference of expressions like "previous"—affects Draft‑Verify‑Revise pipelines that use multiple large language models (LLMs). Using a synthetic dataset of 10 base examples and 21 reasoning‑effort configurations, six LLMs were evaluated for their ability to correctly resolve the ambiguous expression across the draft, verify, and revise stages. Results show wide variance in balanced accuracy, with GPT‑5.2 improving from 0.156 to 0.942 with increased reasoning effort, while Gemini 3 Pro consistently achieved high accuracy above 0.94 even at low reasoning effort, and meta‑evaluators often relied on surface cues when making errors.
By Obinna I. Ekekezie